S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Edmunds first drive of 2004

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-01-2003 | 10:14 PM
  #21  
Quik S2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,115
Likes: 0
From: Devil's Island
Default

Good readings. Being added to the MY04 Sticky above
Old 10-01-2003 | 10:17 PM
  #22  
Evil G's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
From: Jericho
Default

So maybe the new s2k doesn't suck as much as we think??

oh well.. glad I already have one!

btw: the all black dash is interesting too
Old 10-01-2003 | 10:36 PM
  #23  
Zanardi50's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
From: Arcadia, CA-S2K Capital
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by 6sigma
From Edmunds:
"
Old 10-01-2003 | 11:35 PM
  #24  
VTEC_Junkie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 1
From: Berkeley
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by grelude
Old 10-02-2003 | 05:26 AM
  #25  
RWDHonda's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Queens
Default

I feel like there is alot of people that are mad at this car. Like they don't like it already for some reason. I think of it this way.

Honda only has two sports cars in this country (U.S), the NSX, and the car everyone here has.

So why would honda make one of there only performance orientated cars, less performace orientated. That makes no sense in marketing a performance car. Would you think it would be more performance orientated if the the redline was bumped up to 9500 and the car gained a couple of horse on the high end and lost some more low end. You can't please everyone.

Drive one and then talk
Old 10-02-2003 | 05:55 AM
  #26  
Road Rage's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 2
From: Midlothian
Default

Originally posted by S2kRob
The suspension mods as Edmunds listed them would lead to more understeer in general.
..whch is a good thing IMHO.As an old racer in SCCA, I can say that while oversteer can be fun, it is not fun or fast on the track, and that the easier a car is to drive, generally the better track star it is.
Old 10-02-2003 | 05:58 AM
  #27  
Road Rage's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 2
From: Midlothian
Default

yaw control starts to play in to the stability control arena I think - traction control is usually referenced to getting the car moving on slippery surfaces, while YAW (in combo with ABS) has more to do with keeping the car stable when it gets off line, or to compensate for driver error or road conditions. The "attitude" of the car can be inferred by its yaw rate.
Old 10-02-2003 | 06:48 AM
  #28  
TubeDriver's Avatar
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,337
Likes: 1
From: Gods Speed #57 Lemons #77
Default

Excellent article. Bullseye. In terms of performance it really sound pretty similar. The engine changes are tiny ( I would keep my 03 engine), suspension changes are minor (toss up for which is better), gearing might ber better in the new car, I hate the new lights and dashboard setup, like the new front bumper. The yaw control sacres me a little though, what kind of ssyetm is this? I certainly would not want the braking system interactively modulating braking based on some computer reaction to atitude. KISS. Oh, yea I almost forgot about the wheels. I'll keep my old 16" unless the new ones are as light or lighter.
Old 10-02-2003 | 07:06 AM
  #29  
nastinupe1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,984
Likes: 0
From: Alpharetta, GA (ATL)
Default

I think that I want one... No... I am sure that I want one!
Old 10-02-2003 | 07:06 AM
  #30  
reds2's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,392
Likes: 0
From: Costa Mesa
Default

24 lbs. weight gain.


Quick Reply: Edmunds first drive of 2004



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:33 PM.