Difference in Air filters
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Centreville
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Difference in Air filters
Whats the difference in air filters from a generic brand you get with one of the ones on a generic intake from Ebay and a K&N from say an INjen or AEM?
#2
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Somewhere in Time
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i don't know difference .. but if there's any it might be the airflow.
I have a AEM intake and i didn't know that their intakes are not coming with K&N filters anymore ... they are making them .
I'm buyin a K&N Xstream flter for my AEM CAI. i don't like the look on the AEM filter.
I have a AEM intake and i didn't know that their intakes are not coming with K&N filters anymore ... they are making them .
I'm buyin a K&N Xstream flter for my AEM CAI. i don't like the look on the AEM filter.
#3
Air filters come in various types of elements, sizes, filtering areas, shapes.
The stock one is pleated paper and it works quite well but needs to be replaced.
The K&N is a cotton gauze element that is oiled. These work better at filtering when they are a bit dirty. Don't filter too well when they are clean.
Then there are the foam filters. These are also oiled and do a reasonably good job of filtering but they get dirty quite fast and then they don't flow too well.
If you have a small filtering area, you had better have good flow but then, you might have poor filtering. I tend to prefer a large area, high flow, good filtering, but then, this might be somewhat elusive.
So, which one is better? That's a matter of personal preference and interpretation of the benefits and detriment of each.
So .......................
The stock one is pleated paper and it works quite well but needs to be replaced.
The K&N is a cotton gauze element that is oiled. These work better at filtering when they are a bit dirty. Don't filter too well when they are clean.
Then there are the foam filters. These are also oiled and do a reasonably good job of filtering but they get dirty quite fast and then they don't flow too well.
If you have a small filtering area, you had better have good flow but then, you might have poor filtering. I tend to prefer a large area, high flow, good filtering, but then, this might be somewhat elusive.
So, which one is better? That's a matter of personal preference and interpretation of the benefits and detriment of each.
So .......................
#6
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Somewhere in Time
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.knfilters.com/universal/X-stream.htm
K&N X-Stream, anyone have one? i ordered one 2 weeks ago ..
K&N X-Stream, anyone have one? i ordered one 2 weeks ago ..
#7
Replaced my stock filter with a K&N 2 years ago, there was allmost no noticable difference, if anything I had the impression that acceleration was slightly less with the K&N.
Trending Topics
#8
ITG Foam airfilters have massive dirt holding capacity...they use a triple layer construction of varying foam densities. Dunno if they make an exact S2K filter or not or if you'd have to adapt.
Stan
Stan
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Farmington Hills
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dyno tests have shown that some vehicles respond adversely to filters like K&N and the others, while the OEM provided better numbers. This has been the case with some two-wheeled cousins from Honda.
Lance
Lance
#10
Registered User
engine longevity is more important than 1-2hp in my opinion. The oiled cotton type filters are shown through oil analysis to let more dirt in. If you want your engine to last a bit longer the stock paper cone is the best way to go. The paper cone has a massive surface area to start with already so their is your flow.