Decided to see what kind of mpg I could get
#1
Decided to see what kind of mpg I could get
Our of curiosity I decided to see what I can manage in the new car to compare it to the old one ('95 Miata)...
Speed was between 65-70mph. The route was 90 miles. 12 of those miles were stop and go driving. I managed 37.3 mpg I figure 90 miles should be enough distance to eliminate the error in pump shut off and give me a decent estimate.
That's impressive to me considering the miata got 36mpg and has 400 less cc's and turns about the same rpm. So for all intents and purposes the two cars get about the same MPG, but the miata weighs 400lbs less.
Speed was between 65-70mph. The route was 90 miles. 12 of those miles were stop and go driving. I managed 37.3 mpg I figure 90 miles should be enough distance to eliminate the error in pump shut off and give me a decent estimate.
That's impressive to me considering the miata got 36mpg and has 400 less cc's and turns about the same rpm. So for all intents and purposes the two cars get about the same MPG, but the miata weighs 400lbs less.
#3
i'd say that pump error could still be counted for, cause that's less than 3 gallons, and the pump cut off could easily be up to a quarter gallon, which would be about a 8-10% differance, so it could be anywhere from about 34-40mpg by that count, still great.
someone needs to go on a long trip with the s and do a full tank without any fun to see what it can get with full certanty.
still i'd be happy with even 30 for a rt.
i know that in my lude i got an average of 34mpg to WA and back, and that was wit some spirited passing, so i'd say with strick driving it could get about the same as well.
someone needs to go on a long trip with the s and do a full tank without any fun to see what it can get with full certanty.
still i'd be happy with even 30 for a rt.
i know that in my lude i got an average of 34mpg to WA and back, and that was wit some spirited passing, so i'd say with strick driving it could get about the same as well.
#4
That's amazing mileage (at least to me it is). Was this round trip? Just wondering if mileage was enhanced by a lot of downhill driving (maybe your endpoint is at a lower elevation than your start point?). But, seeing that you're in FL I doubt this is the case.
I've owned my S for 1.5 years and 9k miles, and I haven't even hit 30mpg average for a tank yet. But then again, my driving is about 70/30 city/highway, and I've never done a highway road trip so it's tough to compare.
I the F20C & F22C -- performance when you want it, great mileage when you're just cruising.
I've owned my S for 1.5 years and 9k miles, and I haven't even hit 30mpg average for a tank yet. But then again, my driving is about 70/30 city/highway, and I've never done a highway road trip so it's tough to compare.
I the F20C & F22C -- performance when you want it, great mileage when you're just cruising.
#5
Originally Posted by luder_5555,Nov 29 2008, 06:31 PM
someone needs to go on a long trip with the s and do a full tank without any fun to see what it can get with full certanty.
#7
Originally Posted by luder_5555,Nov 29 2008, 09:31 PM
i'd say that pump error could still be counted for, cause that's less than 3 gallons, and the pump cut off could easily be up to a quarter gallon, which would be about a 8-10% differance, so it could be anywhere from about 34-40mpg by that count, still great.
someone needs to go on a long trip with the s and do a full tank without any fun to see what it can get with full certanty.
still i'd be happy with even 30 for a rt.
i know that in my lude i got an average of 34mpg to WA and back, and that was wit some spirited passing, so i'd say with strick driving it could get about the same as well.
someone needs to go on a long trip with the s and do a full tank without any fun to see what it can get with full certanty.
still i'd be happy with even 30 for a rt.
i know that in my lude i got an average of 34mpg to WA and back, and that was wit some spirited passing, so i'd say with strick driving it could get about the same as well.
i don't think you can get a fair number w/o doing a full tank. and a few at that...then average it out. i had a trip from texas to illinois that saw roughly 30.5 mpg each tank. probably 75 mph the whole time, and as it was my first day in the S, i hadn't really discovered VTEC yet.
37 mpg seems a bit too high! unless you had some crazy tailwind...
Trending Topics
#9
Originally Posted by luder_5555,Nov 29 2008, 09:31 PM
i'd say that pump error could still be counted for, cause that's less than 3 gallons, and the pump cut off could easily be up to a quarter gallon, which would be about a 8-10% differance, so it could be anywhere from about 34-40mpg by that count, still great.
someone needs to go on a long trip with the s and do a full tank without any fun to see what it can get with full certanty.
still i'd be happy with even 30 for a rt.
i know that in my lude i got an average of 34mpg to WA and back, and that was wit some spirited passing, so i'd say with strick driving it could get about the same as well.
someone needs to go on a long trip with the s and do a full tank without any fun to see what it can get with full certanty.
still i'd be happy with even 30 for a rt.
i know that in my lude i got an average of 34mpg to WA and back, and that was wit some spirited passing, so i'd say with strick driving it could get about the same as well.
#10
If it helps any, I get about 26mpg in my regular commute which is about 70hwy/30city. Even with the possible error, I'd say 35mpg is attainable in this car at speeds below 70.