S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Cruising gear

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-26-2010 | 05:06 AM
  #21  
JLUDE's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,648
Likes: 0
From: Culpeper Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by Elistan,Jul 25 2010, 10:32 AM
Source?
My understanding is that with lower revs, and slightly wider throttle openings to achieve necessary cruising power, you get less restriction for airflow entering the engine, as well as more complete combustion of the fuel, and therefore get better fuel economy. I'd love to read of empirical studies showing otherwise, though.

Anyway, back to the OP's question - personally, at 35mph, hmm, I'm probably 4th gear more often than 3rd, but not exclusively so.
My own findings over the years? I get 28-30 mpg city and 33-34 highway in my AP1 and I never let the RPMs fall below 3,000 once rolling. If I'm doing it wrong I should be getting crappy MPG's.

The lower the RPM with the wider throttle opening = most efficient? I'd really like to learn more about this...interesting.
Old 07-26-2010 | 05:20 AM
  #22  
AngryTurtle's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 281,911
Likes: 429
From: Charleston, SC. \>
Default

Mines an automatic.
Old 07-26-2010 | 08:34 AM
  #23  
S14 to S2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,247
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JLUDE,Jul 26 2010, 09:06 AM
My own findings over the years? I get 28-30 mpg city and 33-34 highway in my AP1 and I never let the RPMs fall below 3,000 once rolling. If I'm doing it wrong I should be getting crappy MPG's.

The lower the RPM with the wider throttle opening = most efficient? I'd really like to learn more about this...interesting.
not saying you're 'ing but i just have a hard time believing what you said. 28-30 mpg CITY?? what kind of city driving are you talking about, cause that's the type of mpg most people would get from all highway driving. in fact that's even higher than EPA estimates for this car which is like 18/25 i believe.

i get like 22-23 mpg combined in NYC with maybe 1/2 city (including frequent stopping from traffic lights, stop signs, etc) and 1/2 highway and i vtec everyday. i'm not complaining about this number either cause i'd like to see a 350z/g35 get these kind of numbers with same driving style.

back on topic, i shift around 2500-3500 usually depending on how fast i want to go. i don't know about ap1's but ap2's are pretty good even at 2500 rpm.
Old 07-26-2010 | 09:03 AM
  #24  
Crackerballer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,599
Likes: 0
From: Durham NC
Default

I agree. City I am lucky to get 23, more like 20 if I am doing ANY acceleration and run the AC. Highway i have hit 30 before, top up cruising at around 75.

For 35mph, I would be in 4th or 5th, depending on grade.
Old 07-26-2010 | 09:18 AM
  #25  
MBHs2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,875
Likes: 5
From: Santa Clartia, Ca
Default

If i am just cruising i have no problems putting the car in 6th. Keep the rpms low and just relax and not worry about anymore upshifts.
Old 07-26-2010 | 10:09 AM
  #26  
thomsbrain's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 39
From: Windsor, CA
Default

Originally Posted by JLUDE,Jul 26 2010, 05:06 AM
The lower the RPM with the wider throttle opening = most efficient? I'd really like to learn more about this...interesting.
Lower RPMs minimize friction losses, wider throttle openings minimize pumping losses. The hypermilers in their first-gen Insights and manual first-gen Civics generally go full throttle to about 2000 RPM and then shift. The goal is to get into top gear as soon as possible. It's also why the "pulse and glide" technique yields better mileage than steady-throttle cruising, because you basically run the throttle in two modes: fully open and completely off, which minimizes pumping losses.

The AP2 S2000 will pull from around 1500 RPM and you can shift by 2000 RPM, as long as you're not in a hurry. Not saying this is a fun way to drive the car, but it will yield the best mileage. AP1s probably need a few more revs.

As for individual results, tires make a huge difference. No one is getting 30 MPG with a set of Dunlop Star Specs regardless of how they drive, but if you have hard tires, it's easy to top 30 MPG.
Old 07-26-2010 | 06:11 PM
  #27  
S14 to S2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,247
Likes: 0
Default

^that's interesting, i didn't know there was a theory behind all this.

so what you're saying is, when i start off the line, go WOT until it reaches around 2500 rpm (don't think i could shift at 2k), shift until i hit the highest gear right? pretty much avoid holding the throttle in lightly, especially when i'm driving on highway? this is completely opposite of what i've been doing but if it works i'm willing to try it.
Old 07-26-2010 | 09:44 PM
  #28  
NFRs2000NYC's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,852
Likes: 1
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by Elistan,Jul 25 2010, 01:32 PM
Source?
My understanding is that with lower revs, and slightly wider throttle openings to achieve necessary cruising power, you get less restriction for airflow entering the engine, as well as more complete combustion of the fuel, and therefore get better fuel economy. I'd love to read of empirical studies showing otherwise, though.

Anyway, back to the OP's question - personally, at 35mph, hmm, I'm probably 4th gear more often than 3rd, but not exclusively so.
Your gas mileage is based on how much gas you are squirting, meaning, how hard you are hitting the pedal on the right. For you to pass a car (generate x amount of inertia) in 3rd might only require 1/4 throttle, but passing the SAME car in 6th might require full throttle, thus, the same result is achieved using MORE fuel.
Old 07-26-2010 | 09:45 PM
  #29  
NFRs2000NYC's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,852
Likes: 1
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by thomsbrain,Jul 25 2010, 07:21 PM
This is categorically false.

Engines are most efficient at the lowest possible RPM and the widest possible throttle opening.

As for me, 6th gear by 35 MPH.
Absolutely not true.

RPM has NOTHING to do with gas use. I've done 8500 rpm without using ANY gas.
Old 07-26-2010 | 09:49 PM
  #30  
NFRs2000NYC's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,852
Likes: 1
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by thomsbrain,Jul 26 2010, 01:09 PM
Lower RPMs minimize friction losses, wider throttle openings minimize pumping losses. The hypermilers in their first-gen Insights and manual first-gen Civics generally go full throttle to about 2000 RPM and then shift. The goal is to get into top gear as soon as possible. It's also why the "pulse and glide" technique yields better mileage than steady-throttle cruising, because you basically run the throttle in two modes: fully open and completely off, which minimizes pumping losses.

The AP2 S2000 will pull from around 1500 RPM and you can shift by 2000 RPM, as long as you're not in a hurry. Not saying this is a fun way to drive the car, but it will yield the best mileage. AP1s probably need a few more revs.

As for individual results, tires make a huge difference. No one is getting 30 MPG with a set of Dunlop Star Specs regardless of how they drive, but if you have hard tires, it's easy to top 30 MPG.
Again, this theory might work in a vacuum, but not in reality.

Say to came to a light on a 50mph blvd. You are at a standstill, and need to get back up to 50. If you do it your way (shift at 3000 rpm to get to top gear quickly), you will press the gas pedal HARDER, thus your TPS will open the injectors more, meaning, more fuel.

This is assuming you want to get up to 50 in the same amount of time. You can do it your way, with 1/4 throttle, but it will take you a mile to hit 50.


Quick Reply: Cruising gear



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:31 AM.