AP1 VS AP2
#141
Former Moderator
Originally Posted by __redruM,May 4 2007, 03:54 PM
You can't take two single autox races and and say anthing usefull about the difference between the AP1 and the AP2.
But if you want some more data points:
Quickest S2ks at National Tours:
17 national level races in last 2yrs (Nat Tours + Nats): 11 AP1 wins; 6 AP2 wins
2005
El Paso, Walnut Ridge, Atwater, Devens had no AP2s running
San Diego
AP1 100.414
AP2 103.224
Houston
AP1 102.857
AP2 120.249
Atlanta
AP1 86.473
AP2 89.049
Toledo
AP1 73.755
AP2 76.052
Peru
AP1 104.547
AP2 107.684
Packwood
AP1 98.619
AP2 107.905
Denver
AP2 137.136 Woohoo...1st AP2 win over an AP1
AP1 140.360
2006
Ft Myers
AP1 97.769
AP2 98.870
San Diego
AP2 92.784
AP1 94.749
Walnut Ridge
AP2 90.462
AP1 90.912
Houston
AP1 90.901
AP2 92.923
Atwater
AP2 121.827
AP1 123.479
Peru
AP2 109.350
AP1 109.561
Denver
AP2 103.810
AP1 107.128
Packwood
AP1 96.146
AP2 100.743
Devens & Milwaukee did not have an AP2 completing the event
#144
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dry Branch
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sprix!,May 3 2007, 06:51 AM
Maybe you should learn that you are not s2ki.com Post Police! Relax man... I can put in my 2 cents like everyone else here. You don't have to try to make individuals look stupid with personal attacks. (ie your response to my post...) It is amusing to see what surfaces on the forum, especially in threads like these. Who said I was unhappy with s2ki in the first place? You sure inferred a lot of information from those 7 words I posted earlier.
Learn to not take every post as an attack against the integrity of s2ki.com and maybe you'll probably be a lot happier when you visit s2ki.
Learn to not take every post as an attack against the integrity of s2ki.com and maybe you'll probably be a lot happier when you visit s2ki.
#145
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dry Branch
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by __redruM,May 4 2007, 11:43 AM
Scew quickest, quickest is useless based on the argument layed out by RedMx5. What's the averge time for all stock s2000? Averages are much more useful.
Also what's you link? Where'd you get the numbers?
Also what's you link? Where'd you get the numbers?
Averages are indeed much more useful, but we don't have averages. If you have better data then post it and I'll use it next time this comes up.
#147
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dry Branch
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=TRDLiquidSilver,May 4 2007, 06:28 PM]
there are still too many variables in solo2 event even with their rules and regulations.
i posted the F20 vs F22 video but it shows the F20 with the AP2 suspension and wheel set-up. what i want is a true AP1/F20 vs AP2/F22 but we still have the driver variable, unless we put the good driver in the AP1. OOoh!
there are still too many variables in solo2 event even with their rules and regulations.
i posted the F20 vs F22 video but it shows the F20 with the AP2 suspension and wheel set-up. what i want is a true AP1/F20 vs AP2/F22 but we still have the driver variable, unless we put the good driver in the AP1. OOoh!
#148
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dry Branch
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by H22_kHiT,May 5 2007, 03:28 PM
AP2 is better everything,and is newer and improved, this thread should be killed already lol, JEALOUS=AP1
#149
I've never been one to really get into these arguments, but we sure do have a crap load of fanbois on here who are putting down both cars. AP1 or AP2, their both essentially the same car.
There was a lot of talk about the steering ratio being slower in the AP2s contributing to a less than direct response and feel. In actuality, although the steering ratio was slowed, the bushings were revised to improve feel, and the wider front tires compensated for the slower steering ratio. So AP2s offer better feedback through the wheel than AP1s.
Instead of debating on whether AP2s have better "at-the-limit" performance than AP1s, why not just look at Honda's design objectives for the AP2:
Objectives for enhancing the 2004 S2000 chassis included simultaneously improving both at-the-limit track performance and the street performance during everyday driving conditions. Honda engineers re-visited the performance of the tires and suspension to improve overall handling of the S2000 and enhance "limit controllability." To accomplish this, the tire size was increased, body rigidity improved, rear suspension bump steer qualities minimized, and the rear roll center was lowered.
Improvements with regards to Performance and Handling in AP2's per Honda
- Dynamic acceleration potential increased
- Transmission shifter direct feel increased
- High-speed stability enhanced
- At-the-limit performance increased with more gradual fall-off
- Sensitivity to disturbances decreased (less bump steer)
- Steering feedback enhanced
- Brake pedal dynamic feel enhanced
- For 2004, new brake pad material improves the pedal feel and resists fading in high performance driving.
- The nose has slightly improved aerodynamics for 2004 that involves re-shaping the front bumper.
- Honda engineers designed a highly rigid monocoque body for the S2000 and strengthened it even more for 2004.
- Enhanced suspension bushings
- Revised Electrically Powered Steering (EPS) programming with optimized steering gearbox ratios and enhanced steering bushing rigidity
- Body rigidity increased
- Brake pedal rigidity and build-up feel increased
- Brake pads upgraded to enhance brake fade durability and master cylinder power ratio optimized
- Transmission efficiency and direct feel improved with carbon synchronizers
I'm no Uehera-san, but last time I checked, IMPROVED steering feel, gearbox feel, brake feel, and body rigidity was a good thing.
This is what Road and Track had to say about the AP2 in their comparison of "Best All-Around Sports Cars"
"
There was a lot of talk about the steering ratio being slower in the AP2s contributing to a less than direct response and feel. In actuality, although the steering ratio was slowed, the bushings were revised to improve feel, and the wider front tires compensated for the slower steering ratio. So AP2s offer better feedback through the wheel than AP1s.
Instead of debating on whether AP2s have better "at-the-limit" performance than AP1s, why not just look at Honda's design objectives for the AP2:
Objectives for enhancing the 2004 S2000 chassis included simultaneously improving both at-the-limit track performance and the street performance during everyday driving conditions. Honda engineers re-visited the performance of the tires and suspension to improve overall handling of the S2000 and enhance "limit controllability." To accomplish this, the tire size was increased, body rigidity improved, rear suspension bump steer qualities minimized, and the rear roll center was lowered.
Improvements with regards to Performance and Handling in AP2's per Honda
- Dynamic acceleration potential increased
- Transmission shifter direct feel increased
- High-speed stability enhanced
- At-the-limit performance increased with more gradual fall-off
- Sensitivity to disturbances decreased (less bump steer)
- Steering feedback enhanced
- Brake pedal dynamic feel enhanced
- For 2004, new brake pad material improves the pedal feel and resists fading in high performance driving.
- The nose has slightly improved aerodynamics for 2004 that involves re-shaping the front bumper.
- Honda engineers designed a highly rigid monocoque body for the S2000 and strengthened it even more for 2004.
- Enhanced suspension bushings
- Revised Electrically Powered Steering (EPS) programming with optimized steering gearbox ratios and enhanced steering bushing rigidity
- Body rigidity increased
- Brake pedal rigidity and build-up feel increased
- Brake pads upgraded to enhance brake fade durability and master cylinder power ratio optimized
- Transmission efficiency and direct feel improved with carbon synchronizers
I'm no Uehera-san, but last time I checked, IMPROVED steering feel, gearbox feel, brake feel, and body rigidity was a good thing.
This is what Road and Track had to say about the AP2 in their comparison of "Best All-Around Sports Cars"
"
#150
Originally Posted by RED MX5,May 5 2007, 12:51 PM
I'm sorry you feel that way. It seems to me that there are a number of AP1 and AP2 owners (including some who have owned both) here who are simply discussing their preferences. I don't see what you see at all, so please don't misunderstand my question ... but I have to ask ... Why does it bother you?