S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

AP1 vs AP2 – An Owner's Perspective

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-17-2014 | 06:09 AM
  #11  
s2ka's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 24
From: SoCal
Default

I've owned AP1 and AP2 over the past 11 years of S2K driving. They're both great cars. The AP2 is more refined and easier as a daily driver. But for me the true spirit of the S2000 is the 9,000 redline.

Tips to tame the AP1 handling:

AP2 sway bars (best and easiest mod)
Good alignment
Fresh extreme performance tires (RE11A)

Optional...

Bilstein PSS9 coilovers. Better ride and handling than stock, adjustable damping rates and ride height.
17" wheels/tires

A few mods and the handling of the AP1 is as good or better than an AP2 (slower steering rack, tuned for safety/understeer, VSA).

The following users liked this post:
Smallyworld (07-23-2022)
Old 02-17-2014 | 08:40 AM
  #12  
GSteg's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 893
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by kenvai
In my opinion, the E46 M3 because a good handling car because it's break-away characteristics is progressive, an average driver can “catch” the oversteer, on the hand, F1 cars are “bad handling” cars because it's so sensitive at the limits, you don't much F1 driver drifting through a corner, do you?

I'm not quite understanding this. F1 cars don't drift through the corners because they don't want to. Drifting through the turns means less grip which translates to lower time. I think it's a bad definition of what a bad handling car is.
Old 02-17-2014 | 11:24 AM
  #13  
spessx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 448
Likes: 1
From: Austin
Default

I've never driven an AP2 so take my comments accordingly.

I view the AP1 as being similar to the 65-66 GT350's. The later Shelby Mustangs ('67-70) were more powerful and street worthy while the earlier cars were a little more hard core and track oriented.

That said, I like both cars and the AP2's are obviously the more valuable of the group. I'm curious if that will change as they move from being used cars to being classics.
Old 02-17-2014 | 12:42 PM
  #14  
Sharps SSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Default

Sorry, but Your review was just ok for me.
After reading the title, I was interested in your in depth analysis having owned both, but the write up that followed fell way short.

I have an 2003 and have added AP2V'3's with Neova ad08 R's in 215/45 fronts and 255/40 rears and I get "0" sudden oversteer when pushed beyond the limit.
I can feel the rear tires start losing traction and when they do, it happens gradually without any sudden loss or spin!

Next, I plan on adding AP2 sway bars.

Then, I will have the best of both worlds. A 9000 red line which we all AP2 owners secretly know is better (but will never admit), and better handling than an AP2!!
Old 02-17-2014 | 12:48 PM
  #15  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 35,993
Likes: 215
From: Queen City, NC
Default

I remember test driving a new 03 and a new 04 S2000 back to back when I was trying to decide which car to go with. I was buying new, buying in 2004, and I had the option which car to go with.

There were many considerations but the big one for me was, "which version do I want to live with daily?" For me, the AP2 was without a doubt the better car as it rode better, had better power delivery, and more updated styling with the remodeled front and back. 9k redline was nice, but waiting to get to the power band was not, and the extra 50hp below VTEC is used every time. If I wanted an S as a track toy where I'd have the car in the powerband without stop and go driving, I'd lean towards the first version, but I wanted a car that did an all-around good job as a daily as well as a toy.

Any S2000 is great, but imo if you want a car you can drive daily and enjoy when you take it out for sport, AP2 offers a better mix of daily livability and performance. I also think this is why Honda released the AP2 - the engineering team had a chance to see how the original car shook out, and made a large number (Honda stated 2,000 changes) of mostly small changes to improve on the initial version.

Overall, the S2000 was a car that the engineers and designers tweaked over its life. 00-01, 02-03, 04-05,06-07, 08-09, with each iteration being slightly better than the previous, and the largest jumps being the AP1/AP2 change and the S/CR version.
Old 02-17-2014 | 01:18 PM
  #16  
JUSTINTHECOASTIE's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,806
Likes: 14
From: St.Petersburg/Tampa, FL
Default

Or get a decent mileage AP1 and swap in the F22c but I may be bias a bit
Old 02-17-2014 | 02:59 PM
  #17  
Fokker's Avatar
Community Organizer
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,169
Likes: 53
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by Lazyrider69
Originally Posted by Fokker' timestamp='1392606037' post='23018893
Blah, blah, assumptions, blah.
The cars were being compared and the video is a comparison of the cars in question. No one stated it was definitive. For me, the AP2 is a far more refined car in many ways and my personal preference.
Old 02-17-2014 | 04:51 PM
  #18  
jetboater's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 988
Likes: 13
Default

kenvai----thanks for posting your thoughts.

Very impressive and detailed writeup---i think you summarized the differences between AP1s and AP2s very well!
Old 02-17-2014 | 05:20 PM
  #19  
s2ka's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 24
From: SoCal
Default

The Best Motoring video uses JDM cars so they are all 2.0 liter engines with 9k redlines.
Old 02-17-2014 | 05:33 PM
  #20  
thomsbrain's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 39
From: Windsor, CA
Default

Your posted sway bar rates are completely incorrect.

And that's why I always regret looking at any subforum other than R&C.


Quick Reply: AP1 vs AP2 – An Owner's Perspective



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:30 AM.