Anyone upset at Honda for the poor seat design?
#41
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Glenmoore, PA
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gbaker,May 18 2008, 04:38 PM
I really can't see why a manually adjustable longer seat tilt (or perhaps an optional accessory front of the seat extender) and some adjustable (even air bladder) lumbar support is loading the unit down with needless gadgetry.
Of course the Japan available factory recessed dash GPS display would also be nice but thats for another post.
Of course the Japan available factory recessed dash GPS display would also be nice but thats for another post.
I also agree about Volvo seats - THRONES! I don't find the cushions to be short, a beef I had w/ the G35. Back in the 60's and 70's, Japanese cars had seats that were way too small for Americans, but a lot has changed since.
#43
I had the 240, the seat was OK. There is definitely a difference in seat design from Japanese manufacturers. Recaro has the sliding thigh support in most decent german cars, and a seat angle adjuster. I haven't seen these even on recaro spec japanese cars, such as my old evo.
#45
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Orange County CA
Posts: 5,749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I never found the OEM seats to be all that bad (other than being leather and slippery when driving the car hard) I did always think they were semi-comfortable though.
I did replace it with an ASM/Recaro bucket seat and I love it alot more no more sliding around!
I did replace it with an ASM/Recaro bucket seat and I love it alot more no more sliding around!
#48
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dry Branch
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gbaker,May 19 2008, 09:15 AM
I just wanted to know if others thought a minor seat bottom lengthening would improve the seat. I didn't seem like I was asking for a major overhaul of the excellent cabin, nor does it seem like seat bottom tweak (with adjustability) is any sort of stretch for Honda engineering to accomplish.
I (personally) wouldn't compare the S2000 seats to anything other than comparable cars, and since I consider the S2000 to be an under 2l roadster, I have to compare it with Fiat's, MG's, Triumphs, Miata's, and so on; In this kind of comparison the S2000 has some of the nicest and most comfortable seats I've seen in an OEM application.
Seats are what they are, and are a part of a cars "character." The seats in our Benz are HARD, and on long trips I have to use a lumbar support to avoid unbearable lower back pain. BUT, the seats are great at holding on in place when cornering hard, and they transmit lots of feedback from the chassis, so they're nice when driving the car hard. In contrast, the seats in our Lexus RX-300 are soft, have adjustable lumbar supports, and don't bother my back even if I drive for 18-20 hours straight. They provide no feedback, and no support for hard cornering, but they are the second most comfortable seats I've seen in an automobile (the most comfortable being the non-adjustable seats that use to come in the base Fiat 128).
Sports car seats are not suppose to be comfortable, so the S2000 seats are what I expect. The could use more support, but higher bolsters would make entry and exit more difficult, and the darn doors are already too short for my long legs.
Have you looked at aftermarket seats? If you are skinny enough, the Bride seats are nice.
#50
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by shotiable,May 18 2008, 11:23 AM
maybe honda designed their cars for short japansese people with short legs >.<