Amuse S2000 performance figures?
06-05-2004 | 02:10 PM
#2
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,882
Likes: 0
From: Where dreamers dream!
they use the
-mugen intake
-r1000 exhaust
-header
and there own ecu and the car is faster than a ferrari w/ slicks on the tskuba circuit by half a second.
note:full interior and ac
amuse is the way to go period.......
-mugen intake
-r1000 exhaust
-header
and there own ecu and the car is faster than a ferrari w/ slicks on the tskuba circuit by half a second.
note:full interior and ac
amuse is the way to go period.......
06-05-2004 | 04:54 PM
#6
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,882
Likes: 0
From: Where dreamers dream!
look! all you guys straight jumpn to conclusions.
no vid its stated in a mag by the amuse guys themselves
and the kind of ferrari is a "modena"
hey fyrestrke
"order a driver too."
hah. im simply replying to this guys comment, but what you wanna believe is up to you and im not some kid making up
i simply got my info from an article, but i believe it
no vid its stated in a mag by the amuse guys themselves
and the kind of ferrari is a "modena"
hey fyrestrke
"order a driver too."
hah. im simply replying to this guys comment, but what you wanna believe is up to you and im not some kid making up
i simply got my info from an article, but i believe it
06-05-2004 | 06:30 PM
#7
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,349
Likes: 0
Amuse didn't say they beat a Modena; a magazine editor doing a write-up on the car was the one who made the claim that it's faster than a Ferrari on slicks, and I'm pretty sure it's not just a Modena.
One of the reasons the Amuse AP1 was able to accomplish that is the fact that the track was relatively small and highly technical.
ASM is the fastest AP1 now, if you didn't already know.
One of the reasons the Amuse AP1 was able to accomplish that is the fact that the track was relatively small and highly technical.
ASM is the fastest AP1 now, if you didn't already know.
Trending Topics
06-05-2004 | 11:24 PM
#9
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
From: Ann Arbor
one problem: Amuse took of the convertable top, and put on their own CF hard top. As long as 100 lbs, that also took away the fun part of S2K driving experience.
personally, I found Amuse's way of weight reduction is too extreme, I wouldn't mind just strip the interior, that would save a lota money. But don't get me wrong, anyone gotta give it to amuse for their really high quality stuff.
personally, I found Amuse's way of weight reduction is too extreme, I wouldn't mind just strip the interior, that would save a lota money. But don't get me wrong, anyone gotta give it to amuse for their really high quality stuff.
06-06-2004 | 10:44 AM
#10
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,349
Likes: 0
Originally posted by revto9k
one problem: Amuse took of the convertable top, and put on their own CF hard top. As long as 100 lbs, that also took away the fun part of S2K driving experience.
personally, I found Amuse's way of weight reduction is too extreme, I wouldn't mind just strip the interior, that would save a lota money. But don't get me wrong, anyone gotta give it to amuse for their really high quality stuff.
one problem: Amuse took of the convertable top, and put on their own CF hard top. As long as 100 lbs, that also took away the fun part of S2K driving experience.
personally, I found Amuse's way of weight reduction is too extreme, I wouldn't mind just strip the interior, that would save a lota money. But don't get me wrong, anyone gotta give it to amuse for their really high quality stuff.
Some of us don't care for the convertible top. I got the car because there's nothing else like it in the price range, despite me not being a fan of roadsters. Convertible top and motors add weight, reduce aerodynamic efficiency, and roadsters are naturally weaker in structure, requiring more braces here and there, making them heavier than they should be.
I'm taking off the soft top mechanism as well when my hardtop comes.