2JZ powered S (VIDEO IS IN)
#81
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 2,454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JLUDE,Nov 1 2006, 07:08 AM
Q: What's the difference between a 500 hp supra and a 700 hp supra?
A: About 0.3 seconds
A: About 0.3 seconds
#82
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bellevue
Posts: 2,024
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SpEeDxXxRaCeR,Oct 31 2006, 09:37 PM
My 720rwhp is 2 bar of boost 28psi on a pt-67 w/75 shot nitrous with conservative tune as well as my wastegate hose popping off. Hence the graph sprialing at the end. The car will make more hp/torque, just did not get around to doing more dyno runs as my turns were over that evening. I was very happy and figured more HP doesn't make my ---- bigger .
Mind you the dyno I have stops before 8500rpms which is my redline. Compare the graph and let me know what you think.
Forgot to add. My motor is not even built like you think it only has wiseco pistons and eagle h-rods. HAHA and i dog the shit out of it every single day. I wanna see you just throw piston and rods in a f20c and produce same HP. I rev to 8500 too, not to far away from 9200, but then again your hp starts to fall after 750. Mine continues and I believe my tuner said it should hit 750 at 8500 if not more.
Mind you the dyno I have stops before 8500rpms which is my redline. Compare the graph and let me know what you think.
Forgot to add. My motor is not even built like you think it only has wiseco pistons and eagle h-rods. HAHA and i dog the shit out of it every single day. I wanna see you just throw piston and rods in a f20c and produce same HP. I rev to 8500 too, not to far away from 9200, but then again your hp starts to fall after 750. Mine continues and I believe my tuner said it should hit 750 at 8500 if not more.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=0POwsgyj16g
#85
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting. I think it's worth checking out. Don't know that I would do it, but it's definately something new. I remember when I used to work with a local shop, we tried to work out the logistics of dropping an RB26 in. Looks like these guys used a JIC bar to reinforce the bay after they cut the rail... So long as it's compensated, I don't see a big deal with sniping it out.
#87
Originally Posted by 1Fast99Si,Oct 31 2006, 06:50 PM
As a former S2K owner and on my 2nd Supra, maybe soon to be 3rd I have to say this swap is awesome! I love the S2K for its stiff chasis and handling and I love the Supra for its bulletproof drivetrain and raw power. The Supra drivetrain in the S2K provides TORQUE, as well as gobs of high end power. I would image serious traction problems to say the least. My Supra with only about 450rwhp spins all through 1st and 2nd unless I run drag radials. Whomever said 8 grand to do this swap is way off. A used transmission alone (Getrag) is about 3 grand. A TT motor with stock twins(JDM is about 3-4 grand) plus the driveshaft, going single(big turbo, manifold, downpipe, exhaust, wastegate, blow off valve, front mount intercooler), fuel system, engine management, rear diff, fabrication, labor, e.t.c. You will be over 20 grand in before the car is even running.
So yes a cool swap but a very expensive one to say the least.
Jeff
Edit: P.S. Noticed the radiator hose is non existent, so this car probably hasn't run yet. The horsepower #'s maybe just what was quoted as a Supra makes with this set-up. Need to see video of it running and a dyno to prove otherwise.
So yes a cool swap but a very expensive one to say the least.
Jeff
Edit: P.S. Noticed the radiator hose is non existent, so this car probably hasn't run yet. The horsepower #'s maybe just what was quoted as a Supra makes with this set-up. Need to see video of it running and a dyno to prove otherwise.
blues2k3: I was stating that it would be more pratical to put a 1jz instead of a 2jz because of the smaller liters and you probably won't lose that much of the handling.
And also are you aware that a fully built 2JZ had broken 6s, 7s, 8s and is in the 1000-1400 hp range?
A typical supra will break 11s and 12s all day, while a typical s2k will barely break 13s.
#88
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by cruisinhondas2k,Nov 1 2006, 09:06 PM
I was stating that it would be more pratical to put a 1jz instead of a 2jz because of the smaller liters and you probably won't lose that much of the handling.
And also are you aware that a fully built 2JZ had broken 6s, 7s, 8s and is in the 1000-1400 hp range?
A typical supra will break 11s and 12s all day, while a typical s2k will barely break 13s.
And also are you aware that a fully built 2JZ had broken 6s, 7s, 8s and is in the 1000-1400 hp range?
A typical supra will break 11s and 12s all day, while a typical s2k will barely break 13s.
Since when does displacement directly effect weight?
A Supra made it into the 8s? Alert the media! Hell, you can make over 1100WHP on the stock bottom end. I see it all the time. I don't see how any of this is news? I also don't see the point in trying to tell someone they can't read when basic physical principles obviously escape you. The 2jz isn't a cheap swap for any car if you want to do it right. If you don't, then the added weight of the motor makes it redundant. I wouldn't even think of installing one in a 240 unless I knew I had the cash to at least take it up to the top BPU level. Otherwise, it's a waste. Full BPU alone is at least 3k, and that's bargain basement shopping... Add in the motor, imagine the mounts for such a swap were standard and could be easily bought, add transmission, tuning, rear end upgrade, driveshaft... that's about 13-15k right there minimum. If you think building a 2jz is cheap (and I mean building as in sleeves, etc.), then I have some people you should talk to... Maybe they can still get some money back...