2006 S2000 K&N Aircharger
#22
Originally Posted by OMG VTEC,Jul 8 2006, 04:18 PM
Does anyone have a dyno of the K&N FIPK that doesn't say "K&N Engineering Inc." at the top? Now that would be useful.
https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=69312
#23
Originally Posted by S2k Dude,Jul 8 2006, 01:27 PM
#24
Thanks for the dyno, I think I read that thread a long time ago.
Is there any theory as to why the car loses power above 8000RPMS with the FIPK? I can only think of heat soak being more of an issue as the car revs up. If so, with the dyno being stationary and all, that would mean that the "puke n' die" would not be present in normal operation.
Is there any theory as to why the car loses power above 8000RPMS with the FIPK? I can only think of heat soak being more of an issue as the car revs up. If so, with the dyno being stationary and all, that would mean that the "puke n' die" would not be present in normal operation.
#25
Originally Posted by chickdr,Jul 7 2006, 01:23 PM
They claim 9.5hp for an air filter??? Can't see it without dyno sheets to prove it...
OR what does K&N call it... air charger.
#27
Thanks for the input everyone. Im looking at black8's pic , and i dont see any holes drilled. Also, after drilling the holes, are there any additional steps to take like putting on nipples so the o2 sensors is a perfect fit? thanks.
#29
Originally Posted by OMG VTEC,Jul 8 2006, 02:12 PM
Thanks for the dyno, I think I read that thread a long time ago.
Is there any theory as to why the car loses power above 8000RPMS with the FIPK? I can only think of heat soak being more of an issue as the car revs up. If so, with the dyno being stationary and all, that would mean that the "puke n' die" would not be present in normal operation.
Is there any theory as to why the car loses power above 8000RPMS with the FIPK? I can only think of heat soak being more of an issue as the car revs up. If so, with the dyno being stationary and all, that would mean that the "puke n' die" would not be present in normal operation.