S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

2.2 or built

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-09-2005, 07:12 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
KAY'S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Windsor, CT
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink 2.2 or built

So i am almost done tearing down my motor, and i would liek to get somting in there asap. but i am not sure what will make more power, looking at either doingf a built bottom end( rods pistons arp's ect) or just gettin a 2.2 from honda. They are both going to come oout ot be about the same. so if anyone was see or has dyno's of either... please help

also.... what is it in the motor that makes it a 2.2 piston size? or crank with the stroke, if i could just boar the 2.0 blaock with over sized pistons like 93mm's to make it a 2.2.... then i would rather do that.

THANKS
Old 09-09-2005, 09:27 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
mbilderback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Memphis
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Factory 2.2s are stroked to get the added displacement.
Old 09-09-2005, 10:42 AM
  #3  
Registered User

 
steven975's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vienna, VA
Posts: 5,094
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

he's right. bore is the same on both. in fact, you can't bore the S2000 block to any appreciable degree...you can only bore few thousandths for a rebuild if necesary. All the increased displacement is from the stroke.

It's roughly 84mm in the F20C to 91mm in the F22C.
Old 09-09-2005, 12:24 PM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
KAY'S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Windsor, CT
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so nothing on whats better for power?
Old 09-09-2005, 02:20 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Wisconsin S2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Milwaukee Area
Posts: 9,792
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

moving to S2000talk
Old 09-09-2005, 04:14 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
fshwcrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 951
Posts: 1,254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

just build a 2.0 and boost it. higher revs than a stroker
Old 09-09-2005, 05:48 PM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
KAY'S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Windsor, CT
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fshwcrs,Sep 9 2005, 04:14 PM
just build a 2.0 and boost it. higher revs than a stroker
lol please.... the 2.2 can rev to 8900 also. plaese no post whores...
Old 09-09-2005, 06:09 PM
  #8  
Banned
 
kayvan_pour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Santa Clara, California
Posts: 2,976
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KAY'S,Sep 9 2005, 05:48 PM
lol please.... the 2.2 can rev to 8900 also. plaese no post whores...
Old 09-09-2005, 07:30 PM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
KAY'S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Windsor, CT
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

watch what you are posting man... how can you say whore and have ZERO so say abouthte subject.... hope your just HAHAHHAHHA joking.
Old 09-09-2005, 07:33 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
fshwcrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 951
Posts: 1,254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KAY'S,Sep 9 2005, 05:48 PM
lol please.... the 2.2 can rev to 8900 also. plaese no post whores...
oh sorry, i forgot that my 05 has a 9k redline just like the 2 liters

spin a crate f22 to 8900 and youll be making this same thread faster than you can say "speed holes in my block"

edit: and you said a built 2L. build it for 10k rpm. do you understand r/s ratio and piston speeds?


Quick Reply: 2.2 or built



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:39 AM.