10% ethanol = bad?
04-25-2008, 08:36 PM
#11
Registered User
Originally Posted by wirelessguy2005,Apr 25 2008, 08:05 PM
just convert your car over to e85 like i have and i gurantee you will spend less on fuel and make more power in the process.
04-26-2008, 06:02 AM
#12
Ethanol is actually harmful for the engine. 10% is not going to really harm it however in brazil they are actually having some real issues with engines being damaged. The higher concentrations of ethanol they use there put tiny pit marks in the valves and eventually will lead to lost compression and some costly repairs. Its not something that happens over night, but taxi cabs especially in Brazil are really complaining about it.
04-26-2008, 03:03 PM
#13
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Downgear,Apr 26 2008, 06:02 AM
Ethanol is actually harmful for the engine. 10% is not going to really harm it however in brazil they are actually having some real issues with engines being damaged. The higher concentrations of ethanol they use there put tiny pit marks in the valves and eventually will lead to lost compression and some costly repairs. Its not something that happens over night, but taxi cabs especially in Brazil are really complaining about it.
04-26-2008, 05:40 PM
#15
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E85 fuel produces less power than gasoline and lower mpg.
Plus is it creating a negitive economic and environmental impact. At first that sounds wrong but: As stated above - the production of ethanol, especially in the US has led to the rise in prices of many crops. Corn is over $4 a bushel and since a lot of farmers are growing it there is less of a supply of other crops, raising the prices of them too. Which in turn has led to the food shortage problem in many developing/undeveloped countries because they can no longer afford food.
The production of ethanol is also adding to the global warming problem. The clearing of land, farming of the crops and production of ethanol creates approx. 14 times more pollution than the burning of it saves vs using straight gasoline.
Additionally, as a way to help our (US) domestic farming economy which is highly subsidized by the government already, we do not import Brazilian sugar cane which is a much more efficient way to produce the fuel than using corn.
IMO ethanol currently is a horrible choice as a fuel. Until we allow fair trade to take place, and develop newer ways to produce it that is less harmful on the environment (algae) it will be doing much more harm than good.
I'd rather send my money to Canada and Mexico for good old Oil.
Plus is it creating a negitive economic and environmental impact. At first that sounds wrong but: As stated above - the production of ethanol, especially in the US has led to the rise in prices of many crops. Corn is over $4 a bushel and since a lot of farmers are growing it there is less of a supply of other crops, raising the prices of them too. Which in turn has led to the food shortage problem in many developing/undeveloped countries because they can no longer afford food.
The production of ethanol is also adding to the global warming problem. The clearing of land, farming of the crops and production of ethanol creates approx. 14 times more pollution than the burning of it saves vs using straight gasoline.
Additionally, as a way to help our (US) domestic farming economy which is highly subsidized by the government already, we do not import Brazilian sugar cane which is a much more efficient way to produce the fuel than using corn.
IMO ethanol currently is a horrible choice as a fuel. Until we allow fair trade to take place, and develop newer ways to produce it that is less harmful on the environment (algae) it will be doing much more harm than good.
I'd rather send my money to Canada and Mexico for good old Oil.
04-26-2008, 07:22 PM
#16
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by STOPpre,Apr 26 2008, 05:40 PM
E85 fuel produces less power than gasoline and lower mpg.
Plus is it creating a negitive economic and environmental impact. At first that sounds wrong but: As stated above - the production of ethanol, especially in the US has led to the rise in prices of many crops. Corn is over $4 a bushel and since a lot of farmers are growing it there is less of a supply of other crops, raising the prices of them too. Which in turn has led to the food shortage problem in many developing/undeveloped countries because they can no longer afford food.
The production of ethanol is also adding to the global warming problem. The clearing of land, farming of the crops and production of ethanol creates approx. 14 times more pollution than the burning of it saves vs using straight gasoline.
Additionally, as a way to help our (US) domestic farming economy which is highly subsidized by the government already, we do not import Brazilian sugar cane which is a much more efficient way to produce the fuel than using corn.
IMO ethanol currently is a horrible choice as a fuel. Until we allow fair trade to take place, and develop newer ways to produce it that is less harmful on the environment (algae) it will be doing much more harm than good.
I'd rather send my money to Canada and Mexico for good old Oil.
Plus is it creating a negitive economic and environmental impact. At first that sounds wrong but: As stated above - the production of ethanol, especially in the US has led to the rise in prices of many crops. Corn is over $4 a bushel and since a lot of farmers are growing it there is less of a supply of other crops, raising the prices of them too. Which in turn has led to the food shortage problem in many developing/undeveloped countries because they can no longer afford food.
The production of ethanol is also adding to the global warming problem. The clearing of land, farming of the crops and production of ethanol creates approx. 14 times more pollution than the burning of it saves vs using straight gasoline.
Additionally, as a way to help our (US) domestic farming economy which is highly subsidized by the government already, we do not import Brazilian sugar cane which is a much more efficient way to produce the fuel than using corn.
IMO ethanol currently is a horrible choice as a fuel. Until we allow fair trade to take place, and develop newer ways to produce it that is less harmful on the environment (algae) it will be doing much more harm than good.
I'd rather send my money to Canada and Mexico for good old Oil.
04-26-2008, 08:33 PM
#17
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by wirelessguy2005,Apr 26 2008, 07:22 PM
i think you might want to check the source on your information. Most of what you just said is completely wrong. The worst part about this county is that too many people think just like you. so they keep paying the high gas prices and complaining about it everyday. why not seek a long term solution to the gas dependency of this country? or should we all be just like you and try to come up with reasons that it won't or can't work? really kinda sad if you ask me....
Corn for ethanol production is heavily subsidized.
Corn prices have gone up. Current cost is actually 5.90 a bushel, up from a 2006 average of $3 per bushel. In comparison oil average $58 a barrel in 2006 and is now $118.
Corn is displacing other crops and causing water shortages.
20-30% of the energy from ethanol is used up in production.
Ethanol from corn is pretty stupid when dino oil is available. I'm all for finding alternatives, but not when they are not economically viable and cause more environmental damage than they prevent. That said, I approve ethanol because I live in California and I can make more power off it than I can piss water 91 octane. Too bad they don't sell E85 here.
