S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

00-03 vs 04+

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-14-2004, 06:14 PM
  #11  
Registered User

 
MrClean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Powell, OH
Posts: 4,207
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The "softer" suspension is definitely only a relative difference that is really only noticable when you drive the cars back to back.

I did just that and noticed. However, the 04 still rides like a sports car. The way some talk about how much softer it is, makes it sound like the car has been ride-engineered by Lincoln. Not the case by a long shot.

I think the difference, in terms of handling capability, is more dependent on driver than on car capability.
Old 10-14-2004, 06:17 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
steve c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,792
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

The cars have gotten softer every year after 01. Dumb American drivers ...

I used to get a chuckle out of the threads that started about this time of year when the roads get wet and cold -- "I spun my S2000 into (name your object here). You suck, learn how to drive.
Old 10-14-2004, 06:27 PM
  #13  

 
124Spider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Redmond, Washington, USA
Posts: 2,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Elistan,Oct 14 2004, 01:49 PM
The stock '04 front tires have hardly any grip, though. With proper sized race tires the car is nicely balanced, but on stock tires it understeers like a fwd pig.
Wow, this is the first time I've ever heard someone say that an S2k understeers. My '04 certainly does not understeer, on the track or on the street (and I still have stock tires). It oversteers easily if I make a mistake (shame on me, not the car), but it is remarkably precise, in steering, shifting and suspension, and very predictable in any case.
Old 10-14-2004, 06:32 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
mikegarrison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Covington WA, USA
Posts: 22,888
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by steve c,Oct 14 2004, 07:17 PM
The cars have gotten softer every year after 01.
And we used to have to walk to school barefoot. In the snow. Uphill. Both ways.
Old 10-14-2004, 06:36 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
allan-s2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Coconut Creek
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You know everyone states how the 04 was made softer, which is true, but it was made softer at the right place, at the rear. Also, no one mensions that the front was stiffened. This allows the rear of the car to grip better.
Old 10-14-2004, 07:02 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
RazorV3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: VA is for hustlaz
Posts: 7,046
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by steve c,Oct 15 2004, 03:17 AM
I used to get a chuckle out of the threads that started about this time of year when the roads get wet and cold -- "I spun my S2000 into (name your object here). You suck, learn how to drive.
, some people still do not understand the concept of RWD and how it reacts in different situations. some need to stick to the FF cars that are available now.
Old 10-14-2004, 07:15 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
FO2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Fair Oaks
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by steve c,Oct 14 2004, 06:17 PM
The cars have gotten softer every year after 01. Dumb American drivers ...
Maybe they should remove the shocks and springs and make the car really stiff for all you folks that drive on glass smooth asphalt.

For the rest of us that drive on real roads, the "softened" rear end gives a little more control and drivebility to the car.
Old 10-14-2004, 08:03 PM
  #18  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
DimaK321's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: was in Boston; now in LA
Posts: 1,971
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

THE QUESTION STILL STANDS

which handles better 00-03 or 04+

hhhhhhhhmmmm??
Old 10-14-2004, 08:08 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
hpark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Palo Alto
Posts: 2,941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DimaK321,Oct 14 2004, 11:34 AM
there are plenty of discussions about 0 to 60 and 1/4mi... enough of that...

what about handling?

which handles better? 00-03 or 04+ ?

i have seen an average of .92Gs for the 00-03 and .88Gs for the 04+

what is going on? is this because of the softened up suspension?
skidpad #'s only is a small part of how a car handles....
i don't think one handles "better" than another, they just handle differently
Old 10-15-2004, 10:54 AM
  #20  
Registered User

 
Elistan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Longmont, CO
Posts: 15,323
Received 28 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 124Spider,Oct 14 2004, 09:27 PM
Wow, this is the first time I've ever heard someone say that an S2k understeers. My '04 certainly does not understeer, on the track or on the street (and I still have stock tires). It oversteers easily if I make a mistake (shame on me, not the car), but it is remarkably precise, in steering, shifting and suspension, and very predictable in any case.
Serious? You must be reading a different forum than I. There have been numerous 04 understeer posts, most saying that the factory settings has no front camber and an alignment helped fix most of it. For me, an alignment was an improvement, but not enough. (I'm not too worried about it, since my belief is that the front tires are causing it.) What car did you have before the '04 S2000? Keep in mind that my pervious one was a '00 model.


Quick Reply: 00-03 vs 04+



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:09 PM.