Poindexter

Thanks Lude

steve c

Your topic is silly. You have posted similar statements in multiple threads for the past couple of days. Everything that can be said on the subject has already been said -- and yet here you are creating a new post to beat the horse deader than it already is.

Silver9k

26 dead horses

Brownergy

What a shitty preseason huh? Damn Redskins can't do shit. Hope the NHL season has more to offer.






Oh yeah, lock this damn thread.

Wisconsin S2k

that was actually pretty funny

HvRRZ

I gatta say that while they dyno at he same hp from the facory is there a chance that the 04/05 could actially have more torque then they say it does. Or would it have to be some kind of freak? I would no say this if not for my dyno runs at church automotive when I was bone sock. My car had close to 3k miles on it. I dynoed at 240hp(surprising I know ), well we did five pulls and I think they hit in this order 238, 240, 240, 239, 238.And I dynoed my torque at 170!?!?! You could tell I was surprised by this because itis only supposed to have 160 stock. The five runs came out like this, 167, 170, 168, 170, 167. I have the sheet for the final pull somewhere, but I'm not sure where i've put it.

and so people don't freak out this was not for whp..


I gatta add that I think Honda should have taken the 04/05 atleast up to 8500 rpm because according to church the curve would keep climbing if not for the fuel cut.

steve c

Me too, and yet I bet it will not.

Poindexter

I'd say this thread has run its cource as far as S2000 Talk is concerned.