S2000 Street Encounters Stories of on-the-road exploits and encounters.

Turbo S2K vs SRT-4

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-10-2004, 12:07 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
44Runner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Mt. Pleasant, SC
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by adam_gipson
308 whp and 210 lb-ft, and I have 4.77's.

Adam
I would think 4.77 would be too low a gear, especially with all the power you now make. Ever thought about going back to stock or at least 4.57s? Not to mention a lower gear ratio is weaker than a higher gear ratio and don't a lot of you guys have problem blowing your rear ends out? Would seem like that might be more of a problem now with your hopped up motor...
Old 05-10-2004, 12:13 PM
  #22  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
adam_gipson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Plano
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The idea of going back to stock rear end has crossed my mind. Although, in theory the 4.77's should be faster than stock up until I hit my top speed.

Adam
Old 05-10-2004, 06:01 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
1sweet00SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: So Cal
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by wannabuy
When you lose it is usually they have more power.
Old 05-10-2004, 09:22 PM
  #24  
Banned
 
yellafeva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Twilight Zone
Posts: 3,430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Quik S2K
Honestly I would be very disappointed if I just spend 1/4-1/3 of what his car cost total to turbo my S and still got beat. I know how the story goes, he's still driving a Neon, POS etc...but the fact is he probably spent $1000 and is pulling away from a turbo'd S2K, granted its not fully tuned, but its still turbo'd
Quik, there are plenty of cheaper modded cars that can beat a turbo S2K. A turbo S is a fast car for sure, but it's still not a dragster. Go buy a used Mustang and modify it into a monster. There's a cheap, modded, super fast car for sure.
Old 05-11-2004, 02:04 AM
  #25  
Registered User
 
Quik S2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Devil's Island
Posts: 13,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yella...I totally agree, im just saying if I spent $5K+ or whatever it costs to turbo the S I would be extremely disappointed.
Old 05-11-2004, 09:05 AM
  #26  
Registered User
 
speedy4cyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a turbo S that does just fine at the drag strip and awesome on the highway. Actually I just bought a new turbo. I guess I cant defend anyone because shit happens there is always someone out there faster. If you have the money to turbo an S though do it right. I have lowered compression at 8:1 pistons rings and rods with a sleeved block. So you can have an S and be just fine. It runs over 20psi just fine which is good for the highway. There is very little that can compete from a roll. But on the track 15 psi is a little more conventional so you dont spin so much. I have some traction issues but nothing i cant stand. I have 18x9 with 265. My 1/4 was at a 12.2 before the new turbo which is a 50 trim stage 3 wheel and 63ar. IT maxes out at 450hp which is more then enough for an S. I have spray on top just a 35 wet shot to cool things and add power. Needless to say the new turbo spools quicker and flows much more air meaning the boost hits and pulls a lot harder. So if I can get traction should get out of the 12's easily. there is hope
Old 05-11-2004, 09:07 AM
  #27  
Registered User
 
speedy4cyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

But those guys are right much cheaper to buy something else and make it a dragster. I ran into many probs and have about 12k in the motor. So be warned.
Old 05-12-2004, 03:22 AM
  #28  
Registered User
 
Saud2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: kuwait
Posts: 4,686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Quik S2K
Honestly I would be very disappointed if I just spend 1/4-1/3 of what his car cost total to turbo my S and still got beat. I know how the story goes, he's still driving a Neon, POS etc...but the fact is he probably spent $1000 and is pulling away from a turbo'd S2K, granted its not fully tuned, but its still turbo'd
you are right....i would be hell dissapointed if i would have lost
i say get that thing tuned properly to 350WHP+ then smoke his ass !!
Old 05-12-2004, 07:00 AM
  #29  
Registered User
 
steve c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,792
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

400 hp to the wheels (your earlier claim) and only a 12.2?

What is the trap?
Old 05-17-2004, 08:52 AM
  #30  
Registered User
 
naynay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sin City
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by 2broke2drive
srt4 stock boosts from 11-17psi.

i guess one guy on the srt4 forums was pushing 500+plus at the wheels before he blew his engine, all on stock internals. that's not bad. imagine when he builds his engine.
I was at the track when it blew!! He was pushing 550hp on stock internals!!!


Quick Reply: Turbo S2K vs SRT-4



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:30 PM.