Turbo S2k vs LS1 Camaro
01-03-2008, 11:31 AM
#24
Registered User
Originally Posted by geists2k,Jan 1 2008, 09:14 AM
I don't see 756 ft. lbs.? How about .62 times.And nobody's butt hurt?
I just bought a 2008 LS3 Corvette that will be Procharged before the weather gets warm again.
Apples and Oranges.
But to anyone that thinks a bolt-on N/A LS1 off the bottle will smoke my S2000, you are sorely mistaken.
if you wanna turbo the s2k turbo the ls1 too....
the LSx engines are almost unbeatable in terms of making simple, cheap, and reliable power.
01-03-2008, 12:38 PM
#26
dollar for dollar, you can't beat a larger displacement motor! I didn't get a camaro or mustang because i like the smaller more nimble car, but i won't dispute the abilities of the motor, especially in a straight line!
Good run nonetheless, and get that car tuned correctly, and you'll give 'em a much run!
Good run nonetheless, and get that car tuned correctly, and you'll give 'em a much run!
01-03-2008, 06:18 PM
#27
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Quik S2K,Jan 2 2008, 07:36 AM
Lol, 603tq on a Mustang dyno isnt bad 
should be 640-650+ on a dynojet.
Lol, what kind of "bolt ons" on the LS1 vs your turbo'd S?
should be 640-650+ on a dynojet. Lol, what kind of "bolt ons" on the LS1 vs your turbo'd S?
I raced the biggest shit talker there is in Indy this past summer, with a 175lb passenger. He runs a FC RX7 with an LS1 swap + a 125 shot. Granted, on a bigger shot and provided he didn't grenade the motor and could keep some sort of traction, this might have turned out differently. What if, what if, what if...
This was the result.
http://www.indycarscene.com/videos/Highway_Pull_1.wmv
So unless there is some boost or a nice shot involved, I will take that race all day.