S2000 Street Encounters Stories of on-the-road exploits and encounters.

svt f-150 vs s2000

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-28-2002, 03:58 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
12gage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Spring,Tx
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Legend 1 - It seems like you did very well. Lightnings are pretty easy to launch and most L's are modded with at least a chip and filter. Lightning strong points are definitely off the line however they still pull pretty well up to about 120 or 125.








Peace,
12gage

2000 Honda S2000 Silver/Red
2000 SVT Lightning
2002 BMW M3 SMG
12gage is offline  
Old 01-28-2002, 04:07 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
glen5839's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by 12gage
[B]Legend 1 - It seems like you did very well. Lightnings are pretty easy to launch and most L's are modded with at least a chip and filter. Lightning strong points are definitely off the line however they still pull pretty well up to about 120 or 125.
glen5839 is offline  
Old 01-28-2002, 07:20 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
12gage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Spring,Tx
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

In order for Lightnings to run the et's that they do they must get off the line very quickly. These trucks need a lot of torque to get moving off the line. Their acceleration talls off at higher speeds because of the increased aerodynamic drag. This why most modded Lightning post good et's with lower trap speeds than someone would normally expect. I believe that one of the faster Lightning guys runs 11.2 @ 119 with about a 1.5 s 60ft time. To me, a 1.5 s 60ft time is really moving off the line. Glenn, I guess we agree to disagree.
12gage is offline  
Old 01-29-2002, 05:48 AM
  #14  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Legend1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Lexington
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Solely based on my experience with this particular truck one would have to conclude that launching was not a problem for it. Secondarily, I did get the impression that I was holding my own or perhaps gaining ever so slightly when we were mixing it up the first time. That was from a roll roughly 60-100+mph. I have no idea if this truck was modified in anyway, but I will tell you this, the noise coming from his exhaust was awesome sounding.
Legend1 is offline  
Old 01-29-2002, 06:25 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
Z06-KILLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 7,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by glen5839
[B]From a stop??
Z06-KILLR is offline  
Old 01-29-2002, 08:06 AM
  #16  
Banned
 
glen5839's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by 12gage
[B]In order for Lightnings to run the et's that they do they must get off the line very quickly. These trucks need a lot of torque to get moving off the line. Their acceleration talls off at higher speeds because of the increased aerodynamic drag. This why most modded Lightning post good et's with lower trap speeds than someone would normally expect. I believe that one of the faster Lightning guys runs 11.2 @ 119 with about a 1.5 s 60ft time. To me, a 1.5 s 60ft time is really moving off the line. Glenn, I guess we agree to disagree.
glen5839 is offline  
Old 01-29-2002, 10:30 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
RodneyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Boise
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Psicho54
[B]

Damn, how much did that set your friend back?
RodneyK is offline  
Old 01-29-2002, 11:00 AM
  #18  
Registered User
 
texasbman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Austin
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by RodneyK
[B]


He's into the motor swap thing, he's also got an Elise with an Intgera Type-R motor in it.
texasbman is offline  
Old 01-29-2002, 11:53 AM
  #19  
Registered User
 
RodneyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Boise
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I wonder if he is the guy responsible for the DeLoreon on the full-size Blazer chassis I have seen in Austin?
That sounds a lot like some vehicles I've seen around here. El Camino on a Blazer chassis, Pinto on a Jeep chassis.
RodneyK is offline  
Old 01-29-2002, 12:04 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
Alz2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Harker Heights
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by glen5839
I have never driven a Stook so I'm just going of HP/weight and gearing numbers.
I thinks the TQ/weight numbers are more telling off the line: 480 ft-lbs, 4690 lbs for the '02, 153 ft-lb , 2810 lbs.
MT says the '01 (with 360 HP, 440 TQ) will do 0-60 in 5.6 and the quarter in 14.1/96 mph. Probably wouldn't slow down that much towing the S2000, or even your stocker C-5.
Alz2002 is offline  


Quick Reply: svt f-150 vs s2000



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:21 AM.