svt f-150 vs s2000
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Spring,Tx
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Legend 1 - It seems like you did very well. Lightnings are pretty easy to launch and most L's are modded with at least a chip and filter. Lightning strong points are definitely off the line however they still pull pretty well up to about 120 or 125.
Peace,
12gage
2000 Honda S2000 Silver/Red
2000 SVT Lightning
2002 BMW M3 SMG
Peace,
12gage
2000 Honda S2000 Silver/Red
2000 SVT Lightning
2002 BMW M3 SMG
#12
[QUOTE]Originally posted by 12gage
[B]Legend 1 - It seems like you did very well. Lightnings are pretty easy to launch and most L's are modded with at least a chip and filter. Lightning strong points are definitely off the line however they still pull pretty well up to about 120 or 125.
[B]Legend 1 - It seems like you did very well. Lightnings are pretty easy to launch and most L's are modded with at least a chip and filter. Lightning strong points are definitely off the line however they still pull pretty well up to about 120 or 125.
#13
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Spring,Tx
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In order for Lightnings to run the et's that they do they must get off the line very quickly. These trucks need a lot of torque to get moving off the line. Their acceleration talls off at higher speeds because of the increased aerodynamic drag. This why most modded Lightning post good et's with lower trap speeds than someone would normally expect. I believe that one of the faster Lightning guys runs 11.2 @ 119 with about a 1.5 s 60ft time. To me, a 1.5 s 60ft time is really moving off the line. Glenn, I guess we agree to disagree.
#14
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Lexington
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Solely based on my experience with this particular truck one would have to conclude that launching was not a problem for it. Secondarily, I did get the impression that I was holding my own or perhaps gaining ever so slightly when we were mixing it up the first time. That was from a roll roughly 60-100+mph. I have no idea if this truck was modified in anyway, but I will tell you this, the noise coming from his exhaust was awesome sounding.
#16
[QUOTE]Originally posted by 12gage
[B]In order for Lightnings to run the et's that they do they must get off the line very quickly. These trucks need a lot of torque to get moving off the line. Their acceleration talls off at higher speeds because of the increased aerodynamic drag. This why most modded Lightning post good et's with lower trap speeds than someone would normally expect. I believe that one of the faster Lightning guys runs 11.2 @ 119 with about a 1.5 s 60ft time. To me, a 1.5 s 60ft time is really moving off the line. Glenn, I guess we agree to disagree.
[B]In order for Lightnings to run the et's that they do they must get off the line very quickly. These trucks need a lot of torque to get moving off the line. Their acceleration talls off at higher speeds because of the increased aerodynamic drag. This why most modded Lightning post good et's with lower trap speeds than someone would normally expect. I believe that one of the faster Lightning guys runs 11.2 @ 119 with about a 1.5 s 60ft time. To me, a 1.5 s 60ft time is really moving off the line. Glenn, I guess we agree to disagree.
#19
I wonder if he is the guy responsible for the DeLoreon on the full-size Blazer chassis I have seen in Austin?
#20
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Harker Heights
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by glen5839
I have never driven a Stook so I'm just going of HP/weight and gearing numbers.
I have never driven a Stook so I'm just going of HP/weight and gearing numbers.
MT says the '01 (with 360 HP, 440 TQ) will do 0-60 in 5.6 and the quarter in 14.1/96 mph. Probably wouldn't slow down that much towing the S2000, or even your stocker C-5.