Stock S2K VS WRX

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

02-06-2003 | 10:53 AM

#31

Z06-KILLR

Registered User

Joined: Jul 2001

Posts: 7,335

Likes: 0

From: Overland Park, KS

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Mad Max WRX
[B]
" Why are WRX's running slow trap speeds compared to their times?",

Reply Like

02-06-2003 | 11:37 AM

#32

Mad Max WRX

Registered User

Joined: Jan 2003

Posts: 54

Likes: 0

From: Schaumburg

Trap speeds are a pretty good indication of raw power. Yeah, bigger displacement and just plain higher horsepower would make them trap higher. 2.0 is a little ass engine

Reply Like

02-06-2003 | 11:41 AM

#33

alexf20c

Registered User

Joined: Aug 2002

Posts: 20,840

Likes: 0

From: Come see me after class.

With a turbo.

Reply Like

02-06-2003 | 11:48 AM

#34

Z06-KILLR

Registered User

Joined: Jul 2001

Posts: 7,335

Likes: 0

From: Overland Park, KS

that being said.....funny how little 2.0 S2000 turbos can hit 117mph huh?

Reply Like

02-06-2003 | 01:46 PM

#35

s9000

Registered User

Joined: Apr 2002

Posts: 501

Likes: 0

From: Manhattan, NY

Quote:

Originally posted by Z06-KILLR

Actually S9000, this thread started on two cars racing already from a roll and up to speeds of 115 + ... take those 2 factors into consideration and your "imaginary friend" probably has less of a chance against a well-driven S2000 (notice I stress the "well-driven" factor).

Angel

Well your a very funny girl.
Nice stab about the "imaginary" friend. I can see what I'm dealing with here.
Additionally, what does it mean to be "well-driven" from a ROLLING START in a straight line!?

Reply Like