S2K VS SLK 230 & 320 VS Z3 2.8 & 3.0 VS Mr2
10-21-2001, 03:23 AM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Richmond
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
S2K VS SLK 230 & 320 VS Z3 2.8 & 3.0 VS Mr2
just out of curiosity
which of these do you guys think will have the chance of winning?
1) S2k VS SLK 230
2) S2k VS SLK 320
3) S2K VS Z3 2.8
4) S2K VS Z3 3.0
5) S2K VS MR2 T
which of these do you guys think will have the chance of winning?
1) S2k VS SLK 230
2) S2k VS SLK 320
3) S2K VS Z3 2.8
4) S2K VS Z3 3.0
5) S2K VS MR2 T
10-21-2001, 11:39 AM
#4
Registered User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Over the Rainbow
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Which year MR2 Turbo? If you are talking a new MR2 Spyder with an aftermarket Turbo, the Spyder should be faster, but the engine is likely to blow at any time so you may leave behind a pile of shrapnel... 
Otherwise I agree with the above assessments.
Otherwise I agree with the above assessments.
10-21-2001, 01:29 PM
#5
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Irvine
Posts: 8,079
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I believe a certain magazine did a comparison between a boxster, z3 and slk. The S2000 came out in top.
NOt sure exactly which SLK and Z3 but the Boxster was the regular 210 (215?) HP version.
NOt sure exactly which SLK and Z3 but the Boxster was the regular 210 (215?) HP version.
10-21-2001, 03:00 PM
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Winston-Salem
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here is the link to the review on Edmunds that ranks the S2k, SLK, Boxster, Z3, and the Audi TT. The S2k came in first in the comparison.
http://www.edmunds.com/reviews/comparison/...65/article.html
http://www.edmunds.com/reviews/comparison/...65/article.html
Trending Topics
10-22-2001, 11:30 AM
#10
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
0-60 : 7.2sec
1/4 mile : 15.4sec
This is at 3700ft elevation, I dunno how to convert it back to sea level. The S2K is a faster car (I used to own one) only if driven properly. My SLK 320 still catches some S2K owners off guard, the ones that don't cruise at 6000rpm
1/4 mile : 15.4sec
This is at 3700ft elevation, I dunno how to convert it back to sea level. The S2K is a faster car (I used to own one) only if driven properly. My SLK 320 still catches some S2K owners off guard, the ones that don't cruise at 6000rpm