S2k vs E-46 M-3
11-20-2003, 12:12 PM
#35
Registered User
This is absolutely believable. The M3 convertible (even with manual) has run a 13.6 1/4 mi. With slight modifications an S2000 can run that easy. Remember the M3 convertible adds several hundred pounds to an already heavy M3 chassis.
11-20-2003, 12:16 PM
#36
Originally posted by steve c
And I hate people who make shit up to bolster their own fragile egos.
Every one of these bullshit stories further discredits the legetimate kills.
And I hate people who make shit up to bolster their own fragile egos.
Every one of these bullshit stories further discredits the legetimate kills.
Buh-Bye
11-20-2003, 12:23 PM
#38
Registered User
Originally posted by steve c
And I hate people who make shit up to bolster their own fragile egos.
Every one of these bullshit stories further discredits the legetimate kills.
And I hate people who make shit up to bolster their own fragile egos.
Every one of these bullshit stories further discredits the legetimate kills.
11-20-2003, 01:16 PM
#39
This is absolutely believable. The
Auto E46M convertibles are barely 13 second cars, the old E36 auto convertibles struggle to break into the 14's. Sad.
...and every one (well almost) of those bullshit "Guest/Enthusiast" posers make all us "Owner/Members" look bad too. Go troll somewhere else.
Buh-Bye
Buh-Bye
DUMBASS ALERT
11-20-2003, 01:18 PM
#40
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: anywere
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yea I know right it's sooo hard to belive the belivable ha... I bet if they saw the race with their own 2 eyes they would call bs on it! But anyways I just decided to post a nice race between a s2k and a nice M3. ~nate