s2k vs 05GT mustangs?
07-10-2005, 04:30 PM
#12
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Danbury/New Haven, CT
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SilverBullet5.0,Jul 10 2005, 07:25 PM
S2K will lose all day in a drag race. They are mid-high 13 second cars. I dont care what that jackass edmunds.com says. Best ive seen from a stock one at the track was a 13.7@101. Thats about half a second faster than a stock S2K, and half a second is a lifetime.
-Chris
07-10-2005, 04:31 PM
#13
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: raleigh
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by YellowS2kPwr,Jul 10 2005, 07:28 PM
Where are you pulling all of this "useful" info from? Your ass?
A properly driven s2k will hit 13.7 secs @101 and hit 13's all day.
A properly driven s2k will hit 13.7 secs @101 and hit 13's all day.
The bottom line is take two good drivers, take both cars, and the stang will wax the S all day long. youre ignorant if you think otherwise.
And i pulled all of my useful info out of my head, dipshit.
07-10-2005, 04:43 PM
#15
Registered User
Originally Posted by SilverBullet5.0,Jul 10 2005, 06:31 PM
Where at? In magical yellows2kpowerland?
The bottom line is take two good drivers, take both cars, and the stang will wax the S all day long. youre ignorant if you think otherwise.
And i pulled all of my useful info out of my head, dipshit.
The bottom line is take two good drivers, take both cars, and the stang will wax the S all day long. youre ignorant if you think otherwise.
And i pulled all of my useful info out of my head, dipshit.
how is that "waxing the S all day long"??
07-10-2005, 04:44 PM
#16
Registered User
Originally Posted by YellowS2kPwr,Jul 10 2005, 06:33 PM
Disclaimer: This time slip is not mine
07-10-2005, 04:48 PM
#17
Registered User
Originally Posted by Wisconsin S2k,Jul 10 2005, 04:44 PM
dont matter. several of the best drivers have run 13.7-13.8 in bone stock S2000's.
07-10-2005, 05:22 PM
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: █ SF, CA █
Posts: 16,702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I guess they take it personally since the 05 Mustangs are selling for more than new S2000s right now(big markup) and straight line is the only thing it can do.
How about that 63.6 MPH slalom???
How about that 63.6 MPH slalom???
07-10-2005, 05:25 PM
#19
Registered User
Originally Posted by jasonw,Jul 10 2005, 05:22 PM
I guess they take it personally since the 05 Mustangs are selling for more than new S2000s right now(big markup) and straight line is the only thing it can do.
How about that 63.6 MPH slalom???
How about that 63.6 MPH slalom???
07-10-2005, 05:29 PM
#20
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: █ SF, CA █
Posts: 16,702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by YellowS2kPwr,Jul 10 2005, 06:25 PM
Hehe, are you serious? Don't they have them at $27,000? I thought that's how much they cost?
In my area code, edmunds says the premium GT vert is averaging $31,420...That's about $2,000 more than I just got my S2000 for!
Of course the coupe is cheaper and may run 1/2 second faster in the 1/4 mile than the vert...