S2000 Street Encounters Stories of on-the-road exploits and encounters.

S2000 VS 95' - 01 trans am

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-16-2004, 09:41 PM
  #1  
Member (Premium)
Thread Starter
 
Dizings2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Johnstown, PA
Posts: 2,139
Received 160 Likes on 98 Posts
Default S2000 VS 95' - 01 trans am

Im not planning a race or anything, i was just wondering how the S2k would do against a Pontiac trans am.. not the WS6.. just the trans am. Just curious..... Any experiences?
Old 10-16-2004, 09:43 PM
  #2  
Member (Premium)
Thread Starter
 
Dizings2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Johnstown, PA
Posts: 2,139
Received 160 Likes on 98 Posts
Default

Btw, assuming both cars are stock.
Old 10-16-2004, 09:43 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
hapa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Terrebonne
Posts: 3,671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

dude...an S2K is not ment fo rthe 1/4 mile it's a handling car!
Old 10-16-2004, 10:59 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
soundzero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old 10-16-2004, 11:01 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
formulaofsuccess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the s2K would get spanked assuming equal driving skill. that is of course assuming we are talking sheer 1/4 mile figures. taking into account that you will not find very many bone stock LS-1 cars out there (many have at least intake/exhaust which open them up quite nicely) and it only gets worse.

i love my Formula and the bottom end it has but for hands down driving enjoyment it doesnt hold a candle to MY01!

err sorry, didnt notice the '95 in there. from introduction up until the 98 model year all F-body's were LT-1 blocked cars, only in 98 did the move go towards the LS-1 engine. still even an LT-1 equipped F-body will give an S a good run but probably wouldnt gobble it up like the LS-1 car would
Old 10-17-2004, 08:07 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
rioja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

first, put in a turbo... no wait, make that sc.. no..no.. better stick with nos and vafc.
aww fawk it! With all the above installed I can pretty much gaurantee the S will open a can of woop-ass on the trans am

Old 10-17-2004, 08:23 AM
  #7  
Registered User

 
speed4tu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well I have both, and I can assure you that my Formula will kick the S's ass in the 1/4 mile. But overall I prefer the S over the Formula.
Old 10-17-2004, 06:22 PM
  #8  
Member (Premium)
Thread Starter
 
Dizings2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Johnstown, PA
Posts: 2,139
Received 160 Likes on 98 Posts
Default

Im very aware that the S is ment for the "S's". I was just asking a question
Old 10-18-2004, 05:31 AM
  #9  

 
ruexp67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Home
Posts: 79,195
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

A '95-'97 Trans Am would be a decent race in the quarter. Both run about 14.0 depending on driver, and willingness to beat up the car.

A '98+ Trans Am would run about 13.75 stock. No contest there.

At the road course, I have driven both my '97 Trans Am and My S2k at Gingerman and with some bolt-on suspension mods the T/A will handle suprisingly well. However, it also needs brakes to keep up with the S2k, and a power steering cooler is a good idea too.
Old 10-18-2004, 06:48 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
mickfluff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hopkinton
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hapa,Oct 17 2004, 05:43 AM
dude...an S2K is not ment fo rthe 1/4 mile it's a handling car!
sorry, but I hate when people say this.... It is meant to do what ever you want to use it for.... its known to be amazing at handling and actually pretty quik in a straight line..... faster cars out there sure, more torque on some other cars hell yes, but every car has its pro's and con's... I am not starting an argument but if the s2k is slower then another car why do we say, "well it was not meant to be fast in a straight line?" Of course it was meant to be fast straight, and handle great to boot... sure they didn't say lets make a slow car that handles great? Stock 1/4 mile between 13.99 and 14.5 is pretty fast especially for a naturally aspirated 2 liter 4 banger...... toss on a mild nitrous spray of 50 or 75 or a SC and now you are a mid 13 second car.... its a fast car, but agree there are faster cars out there. And yes in the twisties I can answer your question, that the s2k will make the bird look silly.....


Quick Reply: S2000 VS 95' - 01 trans am



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:59 AM.