MY03 vs SRT4
#21
Registered User
Originally Posted by dstanfield1977,Aug 5 2005, 09:37 AM
Why do you say that?
The car has a great racing heritage.
The SRT4 is a huge bang for the buck.
Do you say that because its embarrassing to have a 20K econo car meet or beat the S2K's performance.
I bet the replacement SRT4 (or whatever they call it) will spank the 2K.
The car has a great racing heritage.
The SRT4 is a huge bang for the buck.
Do you say that because its embarrassing to have a 20K econo car meet or beat the S2K's performance.
I bet the replacement SRT4 (or whatever they call it) will spank the 2K.
i hate arguments like this. why?
the SRT4 is equal to the S2000 in straight line, and is BETTER than the S2000 when it comes to getting groceries. that's it. so how does a "20k econo car beat the S2k's performance"? when you say PERFORMANCE, that means more than just a straight line. and the S2000 hands the SRT4 it's ASS in every other performance category without even breaking a sweat.
by the way, the SRT4 does not have a direct replacement. the two cars dodge created to "replace" it are slower than the SRT4 was.
so yeah, i'm so jealous of the 20k econo car that can equal a stock S2000 in a striaght line, or go faster in a straight line for cheaper.
well what about other categories?
cargo space (ie, groceries) go to the SRT4.
straightline? equal when stock.
cornering? S2000
braking? S2000
auto-x? S2000
off-camber or slalom? S2000
resale? S2000 (the SRT4 is projected to be worth only $5000-$6000 after 5 years)
reliability? S2000 (based on problems per vehicle)
looks? S2000
sports car? S2000
convertible? S2000
etc etc.
yeah. i'm real jealous of the SRT4 econobox. it's a sport compact car meant for a younger crowd who is interested in straight line performance. in that regard, it's a good car. but to say it's the "best bang for the buck" in overall performance is incorrect.
#22
Registered User
Originally Posted by Fusion ZO6,Aug 3 2005, 12:12 PM
I'd still rather have an S2K over an SRT4.
#23
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fusion ZO6,Aug 4 2005, 10:01 AM
Joe might have gotten a couple of the details wrong (about what gear he was in) but that's besides the point. I was behind them and they were going that fast.
Kind regards,
Joe
#25
Registered User
i hate the SRT4 (and a large part of this is the fact that too many morons own one).
however, FOR WHAT IT IS, it's a good car. for straight line performance, it's easily the best bang for the buck. it hauls.
but again, for those of us that want more out of a car than just straight line speed, it's not.
however, FOR WHAT IT IS, it's a good car. for straight line performance, it's easily the best bang for the buck. it hauls.
but again, for those of us that want more out of a car than just straight line speed, it's not.
#26
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: McGregor
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wisconsin S2k,Aug 6 2005, 11:55 AM
however, FOR WHAT IT IS, it's a good car. for straight line performance, it's easily the best bang for the buck. it hauls.
but again, for those of us that want more out of a car than just straight line speed, it's not.
but again, for those of us that want more out of a car than just straight line speed, it's not.
#27
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chelsea, AL
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had an 04 SRT4 (same as 05 basically, LSD and the higher HP rating) and took an S2000 from a dig pretty easy. I still traded it in on the S though since the SRT can't handle the turns I think the SRT4 would take a stock S easy in all situations, from a dig or from a high roll.
#28
Registered User
Originally Posted by Vanos954,Aug 6 2005, 12:26 PM
I had an 04 SRT4 (same as 05 basically, LSD and the higher HP rating) and took an S2000 from a dig pretty easy. I still traded it in on the S though since the SRT can't handle the turns I think the SRT4 would take a stock S easy in all situations, from a dig or from a high roll.
from a dig they are a driver's race. from any high speed roll it's all S2000.
#29
Originally Posted by Wisconsin S2k,Aug 5 2005, 05:33 PM
since when did this become a "SRT4 20k car vs S2000 32k car" thread? why, because he doesn't like SRT4's?
i hate arguments like this. why?
the SRT4 is equal to the S2000 in straight line, and is BETTER than the S2000 when it comes to getting groceries. that's it. so how does a "20k econo car beat the S2k's performance"? when you say PERFORMANCE, that means more than just a straight line. and the S2000 hands the SRT4 it's ASS in every other performance category without even breaking a sweat.
by the way, the SRT4 does not have a direct replacement. the two cars dodge created to "replace" it are slower than the SRT4 was.
so yeah, i'm so jealous of the 20k econo car that can equal a stock S2000 in a striaght line, or go faster in a straight line for cheaper.
well what about other categories?
cargo space (ie, groceries) go to the SRT4.
straightline? equal when stock.
cornering? S2000
braking? S2000
auto-x? S2000
off-camber or slalom? S2000
resale? S2000 (the SRT4 is projected to be worth only $5000-$6000 after 5 years)
reliability? S2000 (based on problems per vehicle)
looks? S2000
sports car? S2000
convertible? S2000
etc etc.
yeah. i'm real jealous of the SRT4 econobox. it's a sport compact car meant for a younger crowd who is interested in straight line performance. in that regard, it's a good car. but to say it's the "best bang for the buck" in overall performance is incorrect.
i hate arguments like this. why?
the SRT4 is equal to the S2000 in straight line, and is BETTER than the S2000 when it comes to getting groceries. that's it. so how does a "20k econo car beat the S2k's performance"? when you say PERFORMANCE, that means more than just a straight line. and the S2000 hands the SRT4 it's ASS in every other performance category without even breaking a sweat.
by the way, the SRT4 does not have a direct replacement. the two cars dodge created to "replace" it are slower than the SRT4 was.
so yeah, i'm so jealous of the 20k econo car that can equal a stock S2000 in a striaght line, or go faster in a straight line for cheaper.
well what about other categories?
cargo space (ie, groceries) go to the SRT4.
straightline? equal when stock.
cornering? S2000
braking? S2000
auto-x? S2000
off-camber or slalom? S2000
resale? S2000 (the SRT4 is projected to be worth only $5000-$6000 after 5 years)
reliability? S2000 (based on problems per vehicle)
looks? S2000
sports car? S2000
convertible? S2000
etc etc.
yeah. i'm real jealous of the SRT4 econobox. it's a sport compact car meant for a younger crowd who is interested in straight line performance. in that regard, it's a good car. but to say it's the "best bang for the buck" in overall performance is incorrect.
I would never buy one, but go the track and see, don't suprised when you get embarrassed, its no slouch around the corners either.
#30
Registered User
Originally Posted by dstanfield1977,Aug 6 2005, 05:42 PM
Blah blah.....
I would never buy one, but go the track and see, don't suprised when you get embarrassed, its no slouch around the corners either.
I would never buy one, but go the track and see, don't suprised when you get embarrassed, its no slouch around the corners either.
And "no slouch around the corners". OK? Is that why dodge once again had to create a special very limited version of the neon just to be competitive in street stock? (the ACR) Is that why, at regional and national levels, the SRT4 is nothing more than a mid-tier D-stock performer, while the S2000 is making a good run at the vettes that have dominated A-stock in years past?
Sorry, compared to an S2000, it's a fat kid chasing a cupcake around a corner.
but again, why did you even bring up this entire argument? even though it's 2 completely different classes of car? oh yeah, because you said we should be "embarassed" to lose to one and we are just hating because a 20k modded neon can beat us in a straight line in our 32k roadster.