S2000 Street Encounters Stories of on-the-road exploits and encounters.

Mustang GT Convertible - a little tight are ya?

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-31-2007, 12:03 PM
  #11  

 
pdexta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,948
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blessed,Oct 31 2007, 11:42 AM




Power/weight ratio for the S2000: 2800 lbs./240hp = 11.66

Power/weight ratio for the new mustang: 3483 lbs./300hp = 11.61
And this little piggy cried "wee wee wee", all the way home (After getting by the S2000).


Old 10-31-2007, 12:07 PM
  #12  

 
pdexta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,948
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

The new 605hp GT500 Super Snake only runs 12.5 in the quarter. Mustangs aren't exactly the pinnacle of engineering efficiency.
Old 10-31-2007, 12:08 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
SkyRollin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Feasterville, PA
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

300 hp at what RPM?? 240 at what RPM???

EXACTLY.


Uhm.. I don't care if they are 5 or 6 speeds. Final gear is trivial.

S2K still loses.
Old 10-31-2007, 12:10 PM
  #14  

 
moogleii's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: OC
Posts: 1,924
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They beat me to it, but yeah, I'm surprised you didn't look at the weight, if you were going to bother pasting in the full specs. You can put a 500 HP engine in a tractor trailer, and it still probably won't move that quickly.

I figured it'd be a driver's race, but I was hoping the gearing in the S2k would help out.
Old 10-31-2007, 12:12 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
Slithr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Plano
Posts: 1,906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Put a couple of people in your back seat and let me know how it goes.
Old 10-31-2007, 12:21 PM
  #16  

 
pdexta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,948
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ermac!,Oct 31 2007, 12:08 PM
300 hp at what RPM?? 240 at what RPM???

EXACTLY.


Uhm.. I don't care if they are 5 or 6 speeds. Final gear is trivial.

S2K still loses.
240 @ 8300

300 @ 5750

But what on earth could that prove? And gearing, whether you like it or not, does affect a cars performance.
Old 10-31-2007, 12:28 PM
  #17  

 
moogleii's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: OC
Posts: 1,924
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ermac!,Oct 31 2007, 01:08 PM
Uhm.. I don't care if they are 5 or 6 speeds. Final gear is trivial.
Final gear ratio may be trivial, but what's that have to do with having 5 versus 6 gears?

It's not like having a 6th gear means it's just a gear that the engineers decided to bolt onto the "end." You could keep the end gear ratio the same if you wanted to, and throw the extra gear in the "middle" and adjust all the ratios in between.
Old 10-31-2007, 12:46 PM
  #18  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Chrisbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Liberty Hill, TX (Austin)
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think his first undoing was the front / rear balance coupled with 300 HP. Any idea what the f/r weight distribution is on those?
Old 10-31-2007, 01:11 PM
  #19  

 
pdexta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,948
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chrisbert,Oct 31 2007, 12:46 PM
I think his first undoing was the front / rear balance coupled with 300 HP. Any idea what the f/r weight distribution is on those?
75/70 I think
Old 10-31-2007, 01:34 PM
  #20  
Registered User

 
mellowyellow999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scottrunsxc,Oct 31 2007, 01:11 PM
75/70 I think


Quick Reply: Mustang GT Convertible - a little tight are ya?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:27 PM.