S2000 Street Encounters Stories of on-the-road exploits and encounters.

Mercedes 230 sport vs RX8

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-23-2005, 10:19 AM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
r26372's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No, he was trying to race it was obvious I just didn't join him. RX8s aren't particularly great cars and shouldn't be trying to drag race anything. Most people don't think our S should be dragged either, but at least we're not a complete joke.
Old 09-23-2005, 10:28 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
6speed8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Palm Harbor
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The controversy continues...

According to some reputable people, the RX-8 goes into a 'safe mode' when on the dynomometer and will not make all the HP it is capable of. I have no idea how true that is, however here are some interesting facts that might support the 238 (or so hp Mazda claims):

The RX-8 races in Grand Am Cup ST class, the same class as the Acura TSX and the SC Chevy Cobalt. There have been several rule changes so far this year in regards to making the three cars more even.

http://www.grandamerican.com/Competition/Bulletins.asp

Tech Bulletin 2005-001:
TSX - Min weight =2600 lbs, Intake Cam, Exhaust Cam, Exhaust Header and throttle body
Cobalt - Min weight = 2450 lbs Supercharger pulley and Exhaust

Tech Bulletin 2005 - 002
RX-8 Min Weight = 2650 lbs

Tech Bulletin 2005 - 004
Cobalt Min weight = 2400 lbs

Tech Bulletin 2005 - 011
Rx-8 Min weight = 2700 lbs
TSX min weight = 2500 lbs

http://www.grandamerican.com/CONTENT/Docs/...0GAC%203-28.pdf


The TSX runs 700 lbs LIGHTER than stock with a non stock Intake/exhaust cam and exhaust system

The Cobalt runs 400 lbs light than stock with a different SC pulley and exhaust

The RX-8 runs 230 lbs lighter than stock and I believe it has a different exhaust and runs with an RPM limit ( around 8500).

Depending om how much HP the TSX makes (I know stock = 200 hp) with the Cams and header, combined with the 700 lbs of less weight should help indicate the possiblle true HP.
Old 09-23-2005, 12:33 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
YellowS2kPwr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,906
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

You know what, all I'm saying is don't hate. The car does what it was intended for it to do. That's all.
Old 09-26-2005, 06:49 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
s2kwanter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here's an interesting fact about a Rx-8.

Rotary engine owners can bring tht when the car gets older it gets faster.

Car and Driver did one of those year long test drives.

When the first got it, car went 0-60 in 6. (something seconds) and the quarter mile in 14 point something seconds.

When it had around 20-30,000 miles. did 0-60 in 5.7 seconds and broke into the quarter mile in the high 13s. Not bad for the car.

I really want to hear about somebody racing a turbo'ed rx-8. wonder how fast those things are.
Old 09-26-2005, 06:53 AM
  #15  

 
Voodoo_S2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 17,792
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by s2kwanter,Sep 26 2005, 07:49 AM
Here's an interesting fact about a Rx-8.

Rotary engine owners can bring tht when the car gets older it gets faster.

Car and Driver did one of those year long test drives.

When the first got it, car went 0-60 in 6. (something seconds) and the quarter mile in 14 point something seconds.

When it had around 20-30,000 miles. did 0-60 in 5.7 seconds and broke into the quarter mile in the high 13s. Not bad for the car.

I really want to hear about somebody racing a turbo'ed rx-8. wonder how fast those things are.
The same thing can be said about a lot of cars. Not a trait unique to the RX-8 or rotary engines.
Old 09-26-2005, 08:42 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
6speed8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Palm Harbor
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes, most cars get faster with miles on them, but not all. To further complicate things, there have been numerous ECU re-flashes for the RX-8 that have resulted in both improved power (especially lower rpm grunt) and improved mpg. These have been done over the course of two years and (in my case) 31k miles.

My RX-8 definitely runs better (faster) now 2 years and 31k miles later than it did when new.
Old 09-26-2005, 09:28 AM
  #17  
Registered User

 
joeking1978's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Livonia
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I know a guy who's dropped about 30k into his for some custom fabrication and engine work... he's pushing ****ing 650whp!!




the thing is just a garage queen project car though... he hasn't even taken it to the track yet.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
visser
S2000 Street Encounters
14
05-23-2005 11:19 AM
Nycsilverstones2000
S2000 Street Encounters
11
12-12-2004 09:33 AM
xpander4
S2000 Street Encounters
3
02-21-2004 10:11 PM
carrrnuttt
S2000 Street Encounters
6
05-20-2003 06:22 AM
blue2k2s2k
S2000 Street Encounters
10
10-16-2002 01:40 PM



Quick Reply: Mercedes 230 sport vs RX8



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:36 AM.