S2000 Street Encounters Stories of on-the-road exploits and encounters.

Me vs 355 vs GNX...

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-28-2004, 06:51 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
S4KiD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Washington
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Stock they are making 200HP with 300Ft pounds. The info below is from Fast Cars .net



"The increased performance of the 1987 model year is also more attractive to performance enthusiasts. The Grand National was tested at 13.85 sec @ 99 mph in the 1/4 mile, and a relatively quick sprint to sixty mph took just over six seconds. This made the Grand National capable of out-pacing most of the cars produced during that time and certainly competitive in today's era of cars."
Old 04-28-2004, 08:19 PM
  #12  
Member (Premium)
 
Venomous S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Medford
Posts: 5,047
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I dont know what their times are exactly but I raced one and im assuming it was stock, but from 60mph and up I would end up pulling majorly, and once we hit about 110 or so it was over him
Old 04-28-2004, 09:03 PM
  #13  
Banned
 
yellafeva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Twilight Zone
Posts: 3,430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Those cars are/were extremely ugly. And like most cars of that era, it handled like a semi-truck. Sure they were fast, but any car can be made fast. I don't mean this to be offensive, but that car, to me, is the epitome of a white trash car.
Old 04-29-2004, 01:30 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
wadswoaj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: London
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Can a GNX turn corners?
Old 04-29-2004, 05:14 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
S4KiD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Washington
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by yellafeva
Those cars are/were extremely ugly.
Old 04-29-2004, 08:40 AM
  #16  
Former Moderator

Thread Starter
 
NFRs2000NYC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 18,852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by yellafeva
Those cars are/were extremely ugly.
Old 04-29-2004, 08:49 AM
  #17  

 
Ace10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NoVa
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the buick grand national was the original blown buick regal... the gnx was a factory enhanced version of the grand antional. they are not the same. the equivalent today would the the wrx and the sti.

my guess is that the S would take the grand national (in stock form) on any point to point staright line challenge, while the gnx would stick it to the S.

the gnx was one quick beast. while the grand national was only slightly quicker than the regal with a 305 and a 4 barrel carb.
Old 04-29-2004, 09:06 AM
  #18  
Registered User
 
sirrach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Salem, NH
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

my friend had a GN with 985 hp, but it wasn't a GNX. Sadly he totalled it at the track
Old 04-29-2004, 10:11 AM
  #19  
Former Moderator

Thread Starter
 
NFRs2000NYC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 18,852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by sirrach
my friend had a GN with 985 hp, but it wasn't a GNX.
Old 04-30-2004, 07:17 AM
  #20  
Registered User
 
sirrach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Salem, NH
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yea he told me the turbo's themselves were like 15g's, I never saw the car as I met him after he totalled it, but everyone who saw it said it was just sick.


Quick Reply: Me vs 355 vs GNX...



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:31 AM.