S2000 Street Encounters Stories of on-the-road exploits and encounters.

Corvette beat... convincingly!!

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-20-2003, 02:31 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
Frankyrocco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: silver spring
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default


The C5 will get tremendous gas mileage on the freeway. I cruse at around 950 RPM at 65.
As for the S2000 beating a C5 ain't going to happen without a 70 year old lady driving the vette or the vette feeling under the weather.
I have both a S2000 and C5 and would not begin to try and compare the two. Corvette enthusiast also ask me to compare the two, you cannot and should not. They are both great cars for what they are designed for, that is why I would own both.

As for this race, you probably raced a L98 which was in the '91 corvette (if previous body style, the body style was the same from 1991 till 1996, but went through 4 different engines). It had around 245 horsepower; however, this still would be a good race because how the corvette is set up. I don't believe you should pull two cars lengths on any vette after 1968, if they are "healthy" and I stress "healthy."

If you did as you say great race.
Old 01-20-2003, 02:49 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
PLYRS 3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Erock's my boat!
Posts: 23,749
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by QUIKAG
[B]The six-speed C5 is barely turning 2000rpm at 100mph in 6th gear.
Old 01-20-2003, 03:12 PM
  #23  
Registered User

 
honda606's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: houston
Posts: 5,937
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

That makes since it was an LT1, let's just say if you came across a well driven LS1 6-Speed from a roll, at the end you might not even see the vette!!
If you don't even know how to spell the word "sense" it is hard to take you seriously, let alone believe you know what you are talking about. Might not even see the Vette at the end? LOL. You are kidding right. You make it sound as if the LS1 6-speed is the fastest thing on the road. Ever heard of an LS6 6-speed? I assume according to your calculations that this thing would take off and fly around at Mach 4. Get a grip with the LS1 crap.

I mean the simple fact is 2.0L 200RWHP 140RWTQ is not going to beat a 5.7L 320RWHP 350RWTQ in any battle.
350RWTQ?? What the hell are you smoking? Since we are local to each other can we hook up so I can buy some of it from you? I had an 02 Z28 that I sold to get my S2000. With Direct-Flo lid and Corsa exhaust the car only put down 321RWHP and 335RWTQ at MTI. Your numbers are completely exaggerated and way off. Try maybe 290-300RWHP and 300-310RWTQ stock.
Old 01-20-2003, 04:13 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
98gt281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My dads old 01 C5 made 323RWHP and 347RWTQ at Houston Performance so that is what I am talking about. It was a 6-Speed. Considering his car traped 110 bone stock and most S2000's trap about 97-98 yea the Vette just might be out of sight. If you could not tell I was sarcastic you are are a retard!! If you look in MM&FF the 02 SS they tested made 342RWTQ so my #'s are not very off at all. Your Z-28 was a weak car to only make 321 with those mods, most of my buddies 01+ LS1 cars make close to 330 stock, I actually had a buddy make 336RWHP with a drop in filter. Does this make any SENSE to you?
Old 01-20-2003, 04:44 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
alexf20c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Come see me after class.
Posts: 20,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by ///E46
hahah round off... that means b18's and b16's are 2 liters also... i hate you friend.. and because he sucks so much... i hate you too.... off

That was a bit harsh...
Old 01-20-2003, 05:17 PM
  #26  
Registered User
 
urpow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Raleigh
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well.. gas mileage... C5s get very very good gas mileage. We can't really compare driving habits.. but I get 17 mpg in the city... but thats because I go wide open throttle most of the times and usually keep my rpm above 2000. However, one can use the posted mpg..... do the research and find out that mpg are about the same between the S2000 and C5.

LS1 usually will dyno about 320-330 rwhp. I am not sure about torque. But its in the 300 range. Ohh btw... Camaro (SS) and Corvette (C5 LS1) has the same engine and dyno the same horse power .
Old 01-20-2003, 08:42 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
iskateglobe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: theinsville
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old 01-20-2003, 09:28 PM
  #28  
Registered User
 
Z06-KILLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 7,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by ///E46
hahah round off... that means b18's and b16's are 2 liters also... i hate you friend.. and because he sucks so much... i hate you too.... off
damn bro'....having a bad day!?
Old 01-20-2003, 09:53 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
///E46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: huntington beach
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hahah... yeah.. sorry .. didnt mean it... but that rounding off bs is pretty stupid
Old 01-20-2003, 10:09 PM
  #30  
Registered User
 
alexf20c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Come see me after class.
Posts: 20,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well, if it's any consolation, if you round by up by 5's, we too would have a Five-O. Well, actually, it'd be a Zero-Point-O, so we'd have to limit it to only rounding up. Yah. Up. That's a nice number. Five-O.


Quick Reply: Corvette beat... convincingly!!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:24 AM.