S2000 Street Encounters Stories of on-the-road exploits and encounters.

911 turbo (read before you make your assumptions) :)

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-24-2001, 07:08 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
ultimate lurker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: You wish
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Laughing, reread my post please because clearly we aren't on the same page.

1. Nothing in my post said competing is about 1/4 times only. However, 1/4 times are an excellent demonstration of both hp and traction, and for faster cars, hp and drag on the top end with trap speeds. Note that the 911 Turbo (993, as most of us have been talking about, don't know what Chris actually raced) turns about the same trap speeds as Chris' car at the strip. That indicates that both cars accelerate very similarly, the key difference being that the 993 Turbo gets a better jump off the line than Chris has been able to achieve as of yet.

2. In terms of aerodynamic issues, all we can say to date is that with the trap speeds returned by most 911 Turbo owners (I've only seen 993 timeslips), Chris's car is pretty close from 60 to 120 mph - hence my comment about mid speed rolls. And of course, aero issues only come into play "at speed", don't they? If Chris really wants to race beyond the 1/4 mile, then he's likely to get pulled, but I suspect that such races won't happen too often.

3. Exageration? I don't consider 3.3% more drag an exageration as a lot. Designers would kill to reduce Cd by 0.01. Then there is the problem of the Turbo (993 or 996) having about 3% more frontal area than a regular 911. All told that means that you've got about 6% more aero drag for a 911 Turbo. Add to that the rolling drag from the bigger tires and you're talking about a serious differential. Of course, maybe you don't consider 6-7% more/less power significant - if so, fine. I would point out several tests by C&D which showed that widebody equipped 911's of the 993 and 964 genre had significantly lowered top speeds and slower acceleration times at speed with the same engine. C&D noted this in a test of a Carrera 4S as well as in a test of a couple of Ruf modified cars with the same engine package in coupe and widebody chassis.

4. The AWD/Tires/Etc. sapping power is in relation to Chris' car. A 993 Turbo actually puts about 390-400 hp to the wheels with the front wheel drive disconnected. Chris' car is putting down 334 hp to the wheels now. Reconnect the front driveline on the 911 and you'll see additional losses. 3 diffs, 1 driveshaft and 4 halfshafts will cost you more in parasitic losses than 1 diff and 2 halfshafts. Call it another 20 hp in losses. 370 hp vs. 334 hp. About a 10% differential. Even if the Turbo put 400 to the wheels in AWD mode (and maybe the 996 does) that 20% power advantage over Chris doesn't quite fully offset the weight penalty the 911 suffers. In terms of aerodrag, Chris is still at a disadvantage. He has a more than 10% higher Cd, while his frontal area is only 5% less. But again, if he wants to go racing above 120-130 mph, best of luck to him.

In any event, the real data we have is quarter mile times, and Chris' car, especially if he gets his launches optimized, is enough to give a 911 Turbo driver, at least from 993 and earlier, pause. His trap speeds also indicate that on the roll he is close enough to make things interesting in mid-speed encounters.

Hope that clears things up.

UL
Old 12-24-2001, 09:15 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
always_laughing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Norcal
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by ultimate lurker
[B]<big ole snip>

In any event, the real data we have is quarter mile times, and Chris' car, especially if he gets his launches optimized, is enough to give a 911 Turbo driver, at least from 993 and earlier, pause.
Old 12-24-2001, 10:03 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
carace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ft. Collins
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

And the whole discussion is null if the Porsche owner has modded his car. They have been known to do that.
Old 12-30-2001, 06:35 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
icefire069's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: tampa
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

oh man you should have been in south tampa last night. me and my mom went to go shop and eat over in hydepark and the valet parking over on the restaurant at the corner of swann and rome was a nice line of 3 2001+ 911 turbo and a nice black modena. was that a pretty site to see.
Old 01-02-2002, 09:54 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
derryck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Orange Park
Posts: 4,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Chris' car at 10 psi and race gas gas will put down 350+RWHP which I'm going to say should equate to over 400 hp at the crank so there really is not much difference in hp (at 10 psi). At 6 psi then Chris is probably around 295 RWHP which makes the hp variance much more noticable. There's a big difference between 6 psi and 8 psi and an even bigger diff. between 8 psi and 10 psi, at least where the butt dyno is concerned.
Old 01-07-2002, 12:33 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
Bassmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Durham
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

not a chance huh? naysayers!
Old 04-17-2007, 03:34 PM
  #17  
Registered User

 
REV.Group's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

if you have a comptech aways can get a science of speed pully kit 367whp then you can upgrade a few more things to gave you power like a 70mm header back system okada projects, ground system, j's header and sos throttle body then you can try your luck again that should be more then 367whp if you want to drag better you can go with a C-West kit it's wind tunnel tested
Old 04-17-2007, 09:56 PM
  #18  
Registered User

 
fusionchickenleg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,367
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

reviving 5 year old thread ftw.

hp is hp...an s2000 can be made as fast as a 996tt, and so can a civic to an Enzo.

once an s2000 traps around 116mph it'll give a 996tt a run for its money. it's not rocket science......
Old 04-18-2007, 10:27 AM
  #19  
Registered User

 
osu s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: columbus
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

first we are not even considering the x50 package or if he has a chip which adds 75+ horsepower. I love the s2000 and have never been in a boosted one, but the 996tt would be a lot to handle.
Old 04-18-2007, 03:54 PM
  #20  
Registered User

 
REV.Group's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

get even more crazyer if money is not a issus tech art,RUF.or gambella if you really want to get crazy and if you really love the S2000 then you can HKS 3.4 2JZ-GTE with 2 3730S SPL it fits and make big power
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kitesurfer s2000
UK & Ireland S2000 Community
6
12-13-2011 09:12 PM
rob!
New York - Metro New York S2000 Owners
25
10-02-2008 03:52 AM
20S2.2K04
The S2000 Gallery
31
04-27-2008 08:52 PM
koji187
The S2000 Gallery
25
02-28-2007 07:57 AM
rankoslavujevic
Car and Bike Talk
0
02-25-2005 10:51 AM



Quick Reply: 911 turbo (read before you make your assumptions) :)



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:19 PM.