IS 300s are pretty slow.
#12
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Windsor, CT
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Purple_sky,Sep 9 2005, 06:23 PM
This is the most misleading comment ever!!! IS300 has superbly strong bottom end.
#13
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Purple sky
Posts: 2,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by KAY'S,Sep 10 2005, 09:25 AM
for n/a maybe i have personaly seen atlest 3 blow up. and i have seen with my eyes the rods next to the supra rods.... so they do not even come close. And i am not knocking the car at all i love them lmost actualy bought one. but for boost the bottom end will not hold.
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Windsor, CT
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so your proving my point for me then? they realy can;t hold 400whp for a long period of time... honestly go on the IS board and just ask, i have seen and tuned more then a couple of jz motors, know the internals very very well.
#15
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
check out is300.net, I drive an IS before. Comparing with the S, the IS300 stock is pretty slow. But the engine is very smooth, also the car weights around 3300 pounds.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post