S2000 Street Encounters Stories of on-the-road exploits and encounters.

06 S2K vs 03 RSX-S

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-21-2006, 04:43 AM
  #31  

Thread Starter
 
8kGoodENuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Northeast Jersey
Posts: 6,452
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1Ferris,Jun 20 2006, 11:05 PM
I don't think you know what you are saying. Even from a roll there is a large bias in drivetrain. You can't put a fwd against a rwd/awd from a roll and truly expect that to judge each engines power. Now if both vehicles being compared are fwd or rwd or awd, then a somewhat decent comparison can be made....,but weight,gearing,traction,aerodynamics would still make a huge dent into any theory about which engine makes more power.

Want to see which makes more power? Dyno both vehicles on the same dyno and look at the power curve....even then powertrain will have an effect, but at least you have eliminated aerodynamics,weight, and gearing.

For example, let's say you have an STI that has been converted to FWD (God forbid I know ) that is going to roll on race a regular AWD STI. My money would be on the FWD STI. Is it because because the FWD car's engine is more powerful?...no, exact same engine. Drivetrain loss would be significantly different (theoretically) with the FWD having the advantage, regardless of engine power.

I think it is much more important to look at a vehicle as whole. Roll racing merely hides a car/driver's shortcomings.
Damn... I probably worded that in the wrong way. Instead of using "drivetrain", I probably should have used the word "traction".

What you said is more than correct and I apologize for my lack of verbal choice.

So let me restate... as far as traction goes, I think it is a lot better to go from a roll.

Andre
8kGoodENuff is offline  
Old 06-21-2006, 04:52 AM
  #32  
Registered User
 
1Ferris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bamberg, Germany
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 8kGoodENuff,Jun 21 2006, 04:43 AM
Damn... I probably worded that in the wrong way. Instead of using "drivetrain", I probably should have used the word "traction".

What you said is more than correct and I apologize for my lack of verbal choice.

So let me restate... as far as traction goes, I think it is a lot better to go from a roll.

Andre
Agreed
1Ferris is offline  
Old 06-21-2006, 06:11 AM
  #33  
Registered User

 
ASMspec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: West Coast
Posts: 9,214
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 8kGoodENuff,Jun 20 2006, 12:27 PM
What you said about the track is absolutely correct but... we never spoke about a track. We were strictly talking about going from a dig as opposed to going from a roll. Yes... you are right that it depends on how long the race goes for. But most roll on races seem to last for a while, which I think by then would determine which is faster.

I saw this video of a Lambo Gallardo vs a C6 Z06... and at the start (from a roll) the gallardo instantly pulled on the Z06, but the Z06 came back right after and reeled him back in.

Man... I don't want to argue anymore... lol. Whatever race happens, then it happens... lol. I'm tired of typing... lol.

Andre


I just look at the overall picture, thats all. Of course the most important aspect is the driver. There are a few others too.
ASMspec is offline  
Old 06-25-2006, 09:14 AM
  #34  
Registered User
 
ItalianBucwheat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: -
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Cool! I like the RSX! Not sure why Acura is discontinuing the line.

RSX is a great little coupe.
ItalianBucwheat is offline  
Old 07-19-2006, 06:21 AM
  #35  
Registered User

 
RadioZero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 3,125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

FWIW, my '06 S had no problem with a RSX-S last night. my car is bone stock. i had my GF with me and a 1/2 tank of gas. i have no idea what the RSX-S had, just some random dude at a red light.
RadioZero is offline  
Old 07-19-2006, 02:28 PM
  #36  
Registered User
 
nalVle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Danbury/New Haven, CT
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RadioZero,Jul 19 2006, 09:21 AM
FWIW, my '06 S had no problem with a RSX-S last night. my car is bone stock. i had my GF with me and a 1/2 tank of gas. i have no idea what the RSX-S had, just some random dude at a red light.
if it was stock, of course you had no problem
-Chris
nalVle is offline  
Old 07-19-2006, 02:29 PM
  #37  
Registered User
 
nalVle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Danbury/New Haven, CT
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ItalianBucwheat,Jun 25 2006, 12:14 PM
Cool! I like the RSX! Not sure why Acura is discontinuing the line.

RSX is a great little coupe.
well the new Si has the same horsepower with a lower price tag.
-Chris
nalVle is offline  
Old 07-22-2006, 09:45 AM
  #38  

 
Ws2006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Glendale, Ca
Posts: 3,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I raced all kinds of Rsx's. Fact. A 2005 Rsx with I/H/E can beat a stock s2k. If anyone says different then the Rsx driver was not a good driver. Ive seen Rsx's with I/H/E hit 14.1 at palmdale Ca. 2710Ft above sea level. With my 05 s2k i hit one of the best if not the best times for a stock s2k at 14.4. AND REMEMBER 2710Ft Above Sea level. It is known palmdale is half a second slower then sea level I ran a friends Rsx with Intake with my 06 with just Exhaust and ill have the videos up today
Ws2006 is offline  
Old 07-22-2006, 11:19 PM
  #39  
Registered User
 
k20adriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=8kGoodENuff,Jun 20 2006, 10:26 AM] I beg to differ because from a roll, it is plain obvious what car has more power and which can accelerate much faster without there being any bias of drivetrain.

For near perfect comparison of engines, I think a roll on is the best bet.
k20adriver is offline  
Old 07-24-2006, 07:16 AM
  #40  
Registered User
 
Wisconsin S2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Milwaukee Area
Posts: 9,792
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=bs2k,Jul 22 2006, 11:45 AM] I raced all kinds of Rsx's. Fact. A 2005 Rsx with I/H/E can beat a stock s2k. If anyone says different then the Rsx driver was not a good driver. Ive seen Rsx's with I/H/E hit 14.1 at palmdale Ca. 2710Ft above sea level. With my 05 s2k i hit one of the best if not the best times for a stock s2k at 14.4. AND REMEMBER 2710Ft Above Sea level. It is known palmdale is half a second slower then sea level
Wisconsin S2k is offline  


Quick Reply: 06 S2K vs 03 RSX-S



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:38 AM.