Your S on Track / Course
#1031
Originally Posted by FormulaRedline,May 29 2008, 06:49 PM
No problem. I've also been using data logging to help convince me to decrease the angle of attack on my wing. I think too much angle is a common problem that people are running into without realizing it. It think it's a bit counterintuitive that the center section needs to be flat or even a positive angle relative to the ground, since its airflow is actually coming off the roof. It looks...uncomfortable, but it's faster!
#1033
Originally Posted by dnace,May 30 2008, 08:08 AM
Are you just comparing top speed on the straights to decided how much is too much, or are you saying if lap time x is better with lower wing then that is better. Just curious how you are comparing wing angle to benefit.
Additionally I looked at the lateral acceleration, to make sure it wasn't noticeably decreasing, and of course lap times.
#1034
Originally Posted by KerryF,May 27 2008, 07:23 PM
I have the same alignment on the car I drive on the street. It's the first thing I'd do to any S I own, and I wouldn't even consider leaving the stock alignment as is (Mostly because it's crap).
In short, do eeet!
In short, do eeet!
thanks
Patrick
#1035
Just the alignment from the FAQ. On that particular car, the alignment looks something like this:
Camber: F -1.7, R -2.2
Toe-in: F Slightly out, R 1/16"
On my street car the camber is the same, but my toe in the front is set at 0, and my rear toe-in is 1/4".
Camber: F -1.7, R -2.2
Toe-in: F Slightly out, R 1/16"
On my street car the camber is the same, but my toe in the front is set at 0, and my rear toe-in is 1/4".
#1036
Originally Posted by KerryF,May 27 2008, 09:10 PM
I co-drive this one. Hopefully we'll see some of you at Topeka this year.
http://solosnapshots.com/gallery/main.php?..._serialNumber=1
http://solosnapshots.com/gallery/main.php?..._serialNumber=1
The actual alignment on that car:
Camber: 1.8F, 2.3R
Caster: as much as possible up front, around 6.5 degrees
Toe: about 3/16" out front (going to drop that to almost zero), a little more than 3/16" in rear
For the record, I didn't hit that cone.
#1037