S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

TT point

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-14-2008, 08:42 AM
  #21  
Gold Member (Premium)
 
patinum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Second City
Posts: 5,569
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Voodoo_S2K,Oct 14 2008, 10:25 AM
, that is what I was guessing based on this, but perhaps I read it wrong.
using the smaller decrease of front or rear for cars using split sizes
It's the specification of "smaller decrease" that makes it confusing. If you ran 205/225, then your smaller decrease would be 245-225 = +20. if you use 235/255, your "smaller decrease" would be 245-255= -10. But since that is not a decrease per say, you could interpret your "smaller decrease" as 245-235= +10.
Old 10-14-2008, 08:50 AM
  #22  
Registered User

 
FormulaRedline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

To answer the weight question, alternative minimum weight is definitely the way to go, as you actually get quite a bit of free removal before you'll hit it (you could easily remove the passenger seat and the plastic trim behind the seats). I also heard a rumor (from a NASA official) that alternative minimum weight may be the the only way to asses points for weight in the near future.

Originally Posted by FF2Skip,Oct 14 2008, 10:34 AM
I'm late to meet a guy who can hopefully convert my .mov video to .avi, but the only thing one can add to an S2000 is a set of RA-1's no larger than 245mm and be able to stay in TTD, base class. Or you could run street tires and 5pts elsewhere, but you would be killed!
I'll agree with this. If your region has competent TTD drivers, a TTD S2000 is a bad choice. You just don't have enough points to play with compared to some of the other cars in the class.

Originally Posted by patinum,Oct 14 2008, 10:35 AM
Was looking at the rules and am disappointed that the CR is in TTC**. If i'm reading that right, I can't have a FSB and R-comps (RA1's) without bumping me up to TTB! I don't know if the CR has that much of an advantage out of the box. I could see TTC +7 but +14 seems excessive.
I think they erred on the conservative side here since no one had run one before. That said, I believe the current rules probably place the CR in a similiar spot in C as the base S2000 in D: it's just not feasible. A TTC built S2000 will have better tires, a better wing, better suspension, more power, and the same weight as a TTC CR.
Old 10-14-2008, 09:13 AM
  #23  
Registered User
 
mxt_77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wylie, TX
Posts: 8,482
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Voodoo_S2K,Oct 14 2008, 10:25 AM
, that is what I was guessing based on this, but perhaps I read it wrong.
"the smaller decrease of front or rear for cars using split sizes" means the smaller of 10mm for the front or -10mm for the rear. -10mm is smaller than 10mm, however there are no points assessed for -10mm per the previous part of the rule, therefore there are no points returned.
Old 10-14-2008, 09:20 AM
  #24  
Gold Member (Premium)
 
patinum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Second City
Posts: 5,569
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FormulaRedline,Oct 14 2008, 10:50 AM
I think they erred on the conservative side here since no one had run one before. That said, I believe the current rules probably place the CR in a similiar spot in C as the base S2000 in D: it's just not feasible. A TTC built S2000 will have better tires, a better wing, better suspension, more power, and the same weight as a TTC CR.
Even if the CR were TTC +7, I think it would still be slightly less competitive with other fully prepped TTC S2000's. But I would take it instead of trying to build a fully competitive TTB car and still come nowhere close to winning.

For example:
TTC +7
sway bar +2
235/275 RA1 +9
exhaust +1
=+19
Old 10-14-2008, 09:46 AM
  #25  
Registered User
 
3312DC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: MD
Posts: 8,953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I know there was alot of speculating before, but did anyone get an official answer on the exhaust issue?

catback and test pipe are +2, or +3....

modified or deleted OEM catback are +1...
Old 10-14-2008, 10:02 AM
  #26  
Registered User

 
Jaku's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pico Rivera
Posts: 1,357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FF2Skip,Oct 14 2008, 06:28 AM
i calculated 1 time last week, it's around low 30 points, just wanna double check if i do it right but i didn't know u need to add points for weight
Old 10-14-2008, 10:21 AM
  #27  
Registered User
 
mxt_77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wylie, TX
Posts: 8,482
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 3312DC
I know there was alot of speculating before, but did anyone get an official answer on the exhaust issue?

catback and test pipe are +2, or +3....

modified or deleted OEM catback are +1...
^ Catback & testpipe is +3:
http://www.nasaforums.com/viewtopic....164016#p164016

modified catback is +2.

modified/deleted cat only is +1.
Old 10-14-2008, 10:54 AM
  #28  
Registered User

 
FF2Skip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 48,203
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by patinum,Oct 14 2008, 11:35 AM
Was looking at the rules and am disappointed that the CR is in TTC**. If i'm reading that right, I can't have a FSB and R-comps (RA1's) without bumping me up to TTB! I don't know if the CR has that much of an advantage out of the box. I could see TTC +7 but +14 seems excessive.
And this is why you won't see them in Time Trials. They are slightly stiffer. They are only slightly lighter. Since the base class is TTC, a 255 tire can be used without penalty. Since the car comes with a wing, I would try running 255 RA-1's without a fsb and see how it feels. That would leave you in TTC.
Old 10-14-2008, 10:57 AM
  #29  
Registered User

 
FF2Skip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 48,203
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Voodoo_S2K,Oct 14 2008, 11:58 AM
You could run a 235/255 setup without incurring any additional points.
mxt already addressed this. Points are based on your car's base class and the largest/widest tire. I currently have a 235/255 setup, but only because I cannot find two more 17x9 Volks.
Old 10-14-2008, 10:57 AM
  #30  
Gold Member (Premium)
 
patinum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Second City
Posts: 5,569
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FF2Skip,Oct 14 2008, 12:54 PM
And this is why you won't see them in Time Trials. They are slightly stiffer. They are only slightly lighter. Since the base class is TTC, a 255 tire can be used without penalty. Since the car comes with a wing, I would try running 255 RA-1's without a fsb and see how it feels. That would leave you in TTC.
Yeah, I was hoping to have a car that I could use for NASA TT and SCCA Autox, but that doesn't look like it's going to happen.


Quick Reply: TT point



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:31 AM.