S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

tracking 2.2L running it to 9k?

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-07-2007, 10:01 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Asura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Anaheim, Orange County
Posts: 8,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Don't go over 8400 rpm. The F22 won't make power up there without cams which will require more tuning than you can manage with anything other than the EMS or the Hondata.

At 9k the pistons speeds are too high on the F22...play it safe. Get an older 1012 aem EMS, hide it under the dash and leave the stock ecu where it is like a good cheating bastard would do. Not encouraging cheating by any means or specific means, because we both know that never happens in real racing.

-asura

Old 06-08-2007, 01:25 AM
  #12  

Thread Starter
 
Scot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nashville
Posts: 17,288
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 16 Posts
Default



[QUOTE=Asura,Jun 8 2007, 01:01 AM]Don't go over 8400 rpm.
Old 06-08-2007, 05:42 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
FASTSIIK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: springfield, va
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think the F22 is just as strong as the f20, i take my f22 to 9k almost everyday, and have for almost a year now. The F22 is definalty safe to take to 9k, just avoid long periods in the 8500-9000 rpm range. The engine is worth taking to 9k, it has the same powerband as the f20, just keep your valves adjusted, and your good to go. here is a dyno comparison of the two motors with the same mods. https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showt...0&#entry9194471
Old 06-08-2007, 06:26 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
mxt_77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wylie, TX
Posts: 8,482
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by l8brakr,Jun 7 2007, 09:52 PM
Along those lines I bet this would meet your needs: http://www.hondata.com/s2000kpro.html
I don't know which class/organization he's prepping for, but I suspect that may not be completely legal, because it requires swapping some sensors and stuff, too. I suspect the eManage Ultimate will be his best option.

One of the classes that I was looking at stated that the ECU must simply be in the OEM casing or whatever. If it's the same for you, Scot, and you have the skills/budget, you might look into the feasability of dissecting your EMS and transplanting it into the OEM ECU casing. If it can be done, I bet a lot of people would follow in your footsteps.
Old 06-08-2007, 07:14 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
Asura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Anaheim, Orange County
Posts: 8,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Scot,Jun 8 2007, 01:25 AM





is AEM EMS 1012 a piggyback system? I can use anything that is plugged into the stock ECU. I am mostly clueless about this stuff but my choices from what I know are basicaly VAFC and Greddy Emanage.... and maybe (or maybe not) the Kpro once it is available.
The 1012 is the 1st EMS same guts different packaging. It is too big to fit in the factory ecu location and therefore requires an extension harness...
Old 06-08-2007, 07:53 AM
  #16  

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 6,863
Received 124 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by krazik,Jun 7 2007, 03:24 PM
8500 max on the 2.2L and still expect a yearly rebuild.

I wouldn't run the AP1 ecu. just use your EMS.

-Ry
Related question: What is the lifetime (# of track days, track hours, etc) of a 2.0 at 9k rpm?

I do time trials events, wonder if I should be limiting my 2.0 to 8500 as well except for timed laps, if consistent 9k usage would mean yearly rebuilds.
Old 06-08-2007, 08:00 AM
  #17  

 
124Spider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Redmond, Washington, USA
Posts: 2,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The 2.2 has a longer stroke than the 2.0, so the piston speed is greater at the same RPM. Hence the lower redline. The 2.0 should be able to do indefinite track days in stock form, without blowing up.
Old 06-08-2007, 08:01 AM
  #18  
Administrator


 
krazik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Santa Cruz, CA, US
Posts: 17,004
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=FASTSIIK,Jun 8 2007, 05:42 AM] I think the F22 is just as strong as the f20, i take my f22 to 9k almost everyday, and have for almost a year now. The F22 is definalty safe to take to 9k, just avoid long periods in
Old 06-08-2007, 08:19 AM
  #19  
Registered User

 
tinkfist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Farmingdale, NJ
Posts: 5,689
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Let Scot take what he wants from other's posts. No need to spread the arrogance.
Old 06-08-2007, 08:22 AM
  #20  

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 6,863
Received 124 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 124Spider,Jun 8 2007, 08:00 AM
The 2.2 has a longer stroke than the 2.0, so the piston speed is greater at the same RPM. Hence the lower redline. The 2.0 should be able to do indefinite track days in stock form, without blowing up.
Understand that longer stroke = greater loads. But the 2.2 has equivalent peak piston acceleration at 8565rpm as the 2.0 at 9000 (2.2 has equivalent piston speed at just under 8300). So if the earlier post about a yearly rebuild at 8500 on the 2.2 is accurate, that might imply that a yearly rebuild would be required for 9k with the 2.0, theoretically.

Just interested to hear if there are any real-world "life" issues on tracked 2.0s that are consistently taken to 9k. If so, I'll limit myself to 8500 except for timed laps.


Quick Reply: tracking 2.2L running it to 9k?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:31 PM.