S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

Rollcage tubing specs

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-26-2007, 11:55 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
mxt_77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wylie, TX
Posts: 8,482
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Rollcage tubing specs

I'm reading through the SCCA GCR section regarding rollcages (Section 9.4). It breaks down the required tubing size based on car weight, where one weight class is 3001-4000lbs and the one below it is 2201-3000.

For ITR-B, the S2000 is listed w/ a required weight of 3005lbs.
Section 9.4.1.F.4 states:
[QUOTE]For purposes of determining tubing sizes, the vehicle weight is as raced without fuel and driver. The minus tolerance for wall thickness should not be less than .010
Old 05-26-2007, 05:15 PM
  #2  
Administrator


 
Ludedude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Vegas Baby, Vegas
Posts: 15,835
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The most common tubing size for cages is 1.75" dia x0.120" wall if you're using conventional DOM mild steel.
Old 05-26-2007, 05:33 PM
  #3  
Administrator


 
cthree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 20,274
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

You answered your own question. 3005 - 180 < 3001 therefore 1.625"x0.120" or 1.75"x0.090" DOM tubing. You should choose the smallest OD tubing you can get away with. If you went with cro-moly it would be smaller still (a better choice if you can do it).
Old 05-30-2007, 07:48 AM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
mxt_77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wylie, TX
Posts: 8,482
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Another question/clarification. In the SCCA GCR, it states that the tubing size requirements for various car-weights and classes. For the 2001-3000lb range, they list the following:
1.500 x .120 DOM / Seamless / Alloy
1.625 x .120 DOM / Seamless / Alloy
1.750 x .095 DOM / Seamless / Alloy

Does that mean I can use any of those tubing sizes, regardless of whether I use DOM mild steel or chromoly? From what I've found, the 1.75x.095 is actually lighter per linear foot than the smaller diameter sizes with the thicker walls.
Old 05-30-2007, 08:29 AM
  #5  
Registered User

 
Orthonormal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Azusa
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The 1.75x0.095 would be 8% lighter than the 1.5x0.120 assuming the dimensions were exact.
Old 05-30-2007, 08:33 AM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
mxt_77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wylie, TX
Posts: 8,482
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Orthonormal,May 30 2007, 10:29 AM
The 1.75x0.095 would be 8% lighter than the 1.5x0.120 assuming the dimensions were exact.
Looks about right to me. The site I looked at had them listed as follows:
Chromoly 1.500" x .120" = 1.7690 lbs/ft
Chromoly 1.625" x .120" = 1.9200 lbs/ft
Chromoly 1.750" x .095" = 1.6790 lbs/ft
Old 05-30-2007, 09:35 AM
  #7  
Registered User

 
FormulaRedline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Actually, the 1.500" x .120" would be about 5% heavier than the 1.750" x .095" (which agrees with the lbs/ft numbers just posted).

If weight was the only consideration, that's a significant difference, but when welding a roll cage into an existing car, packaging is also a major concern. Make sure you consider this before you go out and buy one size just because it's lighter.
Old 05-30-2007, 09:42 AM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
mxt_77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wylie, TX
Posts: 8,482
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

^ Yeah, good point regarding packaging. I got the same tip from a guy in my local forum.
Old 05-30-2007, 10:18 AM
  #9  
Administrator


 
krazik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Santa Cruz, CA, US
Posts: 17,004
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Also check the weight of DOM, it should be about the same as chromo.
Old 05-30-2007, 10:47 AM
  #10  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
mxt_77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wylie, TX
Posts: 8,482
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by krazik,May 30 2007, 12:18 PM
Also check the weight of DOM, it should be about the same as chromo.
Yeah, same guy from my local forum just pointed that out, as well. Not sure why I thought chromoly was lighter. I think I'd just always heard that chromoly cages can be lighter, but didn't realize that it was due to the fact they can use smaller/less tubing and still have the same strength as mild steel.


Quick Reply: Rollcage tubing specs



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:35 PM.