Pad wear question
#22
Registered User
Originally Posted by 124Spider,Mar 9 2005, 12:47 PM
Do I gather that one doesn't really need a track to properly bed the race pads; a deserted, fairly high-speed road will be quite sufficient?
Sorry, that's the best answer any of us can give you. Just be careful with a new set of pads on the track the first time. Be alert for issues that might or might not develop when you get them really hot.
And choose your spots to push your brake performance. For instance, it would be much better to find you had serious "green fade" issues at T8 or T3A on PR than at T2. T8 or T3A you have runoff -- T2 you will be in the tirewall. If your new brakes suddenly seem to "go away", that's when you need to slow down, do a cooldown lap, and pull off the track. You will probably be able to see the gasses coming off them in the paddock.
#23
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gods Speed #57 Lemons #77
Posts: 6,337
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Good points raised in this thread!
I have a local road with little to no traffic at night which is were I bed my pads in.
I run a cadmium plated, cryo treated blank OEM rotor with OEM pads for street and autoX and use painted OEM blank rotors with track pads for the track.
Switching rotors and pads vs. just pads only add a couple minutes to the total switchover time.
You don't really need that little screw to hold the rotors on, the wheel/lugnuts dod pretty good job of holding thing together.
I have a local road with little to no traffic at night which is were I bed my pads in.
I run a cadmium plated, cryo treated blank OEM rotor with OEM pads for street and autoX and use painted OEM blank rotors with track pads for the track.
Switching rotors and pads vs. just pads only add a couple minutes to the total switchover time.
You don't really need that little screw to hold the rotors on, the wheel/lugnuts dod pretty good job of holding thing together.
#24
Registered User
Originally Posted by TubeDriver,Mar 10 2005, 09:37 AM
You don't really need that little screw to hold the rotors on, the wheel/lugnuts dod pretty good job of holding thing together.
#25
Registered User
Originally Posted by TubeDriver,Mar 10 2005, 10:37 AM
Good points raised in this thread!
I have a local road with little to no traffic at night which is were I bed my pads in.
I run a cadmium plated, cryo treated blank OEM rotor with OEM pads for street and autoX and use painted OEM blank rotors with track pads for the track.
Switching rotors and pads vs. just pads only add a couple minutes to the total switchover time.
You don't really need that little screw to hold the rotors on, the wheel/lugnuts dod pretty good job of holding thing together.
I have a local road with little to no traffic at night which is were I bed my pads in.
I run a cadmium plated, cryo treated blank OEM rotor with OEM pads for street and autoX and use painted OEM blank rotors with track pads for the track.
Switching rotors and pads vs. just pads only add a couple minutes to the total switchover time.
You don't really need that little screw to hold the rotors on, the wheel/lugnuts dod pretty good job of holding thing together.
Ask me how I know.
#26
Registered User
Originally Posted by jerrypeterson,Mar 10 2005, 12:16 PM
You'll kill your wheel studs if you don't use the screws. Even at specified torque for the lug nuts, the disc will slip under hard braking.
Ask me how I know.
Ask me how I know.
The lugs clamp the rotor between the wheel and the hub, and the metal-to-metal friction is where the load gets transfered. At least, that's the way it looks to me.
#27
Registered User
I couldn't agree more. That was my own justification for running without the screws in the first place. Sadly, the reality is a little different than I expected.
#28
Registered User
The braking torque load goes from the ground, to the tire, to the wheel. No dispute, right?
It also goes from the rotor to the pad to the caliper to the flanges to the suspension.
So the only question left is how it goes from the rotor to the wheel. If those little screws were part of the path, it would have to go from the rotor to the hub through those screws, and then to the wheel via the studs. Call that path A.
Path B would be from the rotor to the studs directly, and then studs to the wheel.
Path C is direct friction from the rotor to the wheel.
Both B and A go through the studs, so if you had stud failure I can't see how a switch from A to B would make any difference. But I think path C is the actual load path anyway.
There is also a non-torque thrust load, which goes from the wheel to the wheel bearing to the suspension. I can't see how this load would be affected by those little screws either.
It also goes from the rotor to the pad to the caliper to the flanges to the suspension.
So the only question left is how it goes from the rotor to the wheel. If those little screws were part of the path, it would have to go from the rotor to the hub through those screws, and then to the wheel via the studs. Call that path A.
Path B would be from the rotor to the studs directly, and then studs to the wheel.
Path C is direct friction from the rotor to the wheel.
Both B and A go through the studs, so if you had stud failure I can't see how a switch from A to B would make any difference. But I think path C is the actual load path anyway.
There is also a non-torque thrust load, which goes from the wheel to the wheel bearing to the suspension. I can't see how this load would be affected by those little screws either.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post