Little quicker, 13.46@103.96
#21
Originally Posted by 8kGoodENuff,Oct 10 2007, 07:35 AM
That's a very good time...
I wish I had less weight too but oh well.
So if you didn't shift into 5th Gear... how did you manage to trap at 103 mph? 4th Gear maxes out at 98 mph.
Andre
I wish I had less weight too but oh well.
So if you didn't shift into 5th Gear... how did you manage to trap at 103 mph? 4th Gear maxes out at 98 mph.
Andre
#22
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gods Speed #57 Lemons #77
Posts: 6,337
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by peteyj88,Dec 6 2007, 02:13 AM
Dude, that's awesome!! If you're able to hit these times and possibly something inside the 12's, you'll be very competitive with the latest 350z reving up to 7500 rpm and supposedly doing quarters at mid to low 13s and high 12s with bolt ons...that's insane!! Also, 12s are Lotus Exige territory...
Still though, 13.4 on small add ons!!
Still though, 13.4 on small add ons!!
#23
Originally Posted by TubeDriver,Dec 6 2007, 12:43 PM
There is absolutely no way a basically stock S2000 is going to break into the 12s.
#25
I dont know, I cant see an n/a s2000 spiinin all the way to third... and running those times... just my .02 If your car did run those times, props to you, but i'm just havin a hard time believin an n/a s2000 with bolt ons (and no gear swap) can run those times..
#27
his time makes sense. a 13.3-13.5 is very doable with a 104 trap. now a 12.9XXX i highly doubt unless your gonna improve that 60 to a 1.6ish <slicks with a diff destroying launch> or add some more power.
congrats on the nice time though.
congrats on the nice time though.
#29
Originally Posted by s2000Junky,Nov 24 2007, 12:44 AM
Why don't you pull your clutch delay valve off