S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

How does APR GTC-300 Wing Rank up?

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-27-2009, 11:06 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
smirfs2k05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Victorville
Posts: 8,255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

his next question will be whats aoa

angle of attack..
Old 10-27-2009, 11:44 PM
  #22  
Registered User

 
hippo and dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sacramento/Elk Grove, CA
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

his next question..

what is that



oh man, i love these gt wings!!
Old 10-28-2009, 07:10 AM
  #23  
Registered User

 
bellwilliam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ignoring airfoil. When wing is mounted on floor in a wing tunnel. A 3d wing will achieve zero down force when middle half is pointed up 4 degree and the sides are pointed down 4 degree. That can't be very aerodynamic comparing to a 2d wing at zero degree.

So I don't think it is fair to compare a 2d against 3d wing in a wind tunnel. In theory a 3d wing is designed so when sides are zero degree, the middle part is pointed up also parallel to the air stream, achieving zero down force (again ignoring air foil). a 2D wing will have to have its wing pointed up 4 degree, so middle is 4 degree down compared to incoming air stream over the top, sides are pointed UP 4 degree, not very aero.

again, this is what 3D wing claims. all theory.
Old 10-29-2009, 12:22 AM
  #24  
BKL
Registered User
 
BKL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Remember CFD data can't really be compared directly unless they are done by the same engineer. Assuming that engineers did it.
Also, CFD data for wings are not accurate without testing the car as well. But, it's better than nothing I guess...
Old 11-01-2009, 07:03 AM
  #25  
Registered User

 
FormulaRedline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BKL,Oct 29 2009, 03:22 AM
Remember CFD data can't really be compared directly unless they are done by the same engineer. Assuming that engineers did it.
Also, CFD data for wings are not accurate without testing the car as well. But, it's better than nothing I guess...
^This. That comparison is completely worthless.
Old 11-28-2009, 12:00 AM
  #26  
Registered User
 
kognition's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bellwilliam,Oct 27 2009, 07:34 PM
not sure if it is fair to compare the two. Kognition is a 2D wing vs. 3D for GTC300.
There is no such thing as a 2D wing. All wings have three dimensions: Width, Height and Depth. 2D would be a piece of paper for a wing.
CFD works, so does real track testing, and so does wind tunnel testing. We use CFD before we go to the track and test a new wing.
Old 11-28-2009, 11:31 AM
  #27  
BKL
Registered User
 
BKL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kognition,Nov 28 2009, 01:00 AM
There is no such thing as a 2D wing. All wings have three dimensions: Width, Height and Depth. 2D would be a piece of paper for a wing.
CFD works, so does real track testing, and so does wind tunnel testing. We use CFD before we go to the track and test a new wing.
By "3D" he is referring to a spanwise twist. The term "3D" is more of a marketing term , as usual

Which CFD software do you guys use for the analysis of your wing elements?
Old 11-28-2009, 09:29 PM
  #28  
Registered User
 
kognition's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BKL,Nov 28 2009, 12:31 PM
By "3D" he is referring to a spanwise twist. The term "3D" is more of a marketing term , as usual

Which CFD software do you guys use for the analysis of your wing elements?
I know, unfortunately it's an irresponsible term. But in this industry, there is alot of mumbo jumbo jargon.
I use Multisurface Aerodynamics, and Visual Foil. Both from Dr. Patrick HanleyHanley Innovations
I started recently working with a lead aerodynamics designer for Northrop Grumman by the name of Barnaby Wainfan on Chris Rado's new AWD TC time attack car. So i kind of have a mentor of sorts.
Old 11-29-2009, 12:38 AM
  #29  
BKL
Registered User
 
BKL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Looks good! good to see some more concrete R&D in this field.
Old 11-29-2009, 08:15 AM
  #30  
Registered User
 
kognition's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I just noticed that PTUNING advertises here. They just brought home the Mod FWD championship in Redline time attack with one of our wings. Great bunch of dedicated track junkies there.


Quick Reply: How does APR GTC-300 Wing Rank up?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:18 PM.