Grime's Spec Koni Shock Dyno Plots - Q's and C's
#33
I figured. Just throwing out another data point. That said. even near full stiff i have not had issues with bumps even in the bumpy lots we use up here in the Philly area and such. which goes to show that snapshot point more. Somehow my fronts even near full stiff stay on the ground and never seem to loose traction (unless i do something stupid... which is often... but not applicable to this thread) Granted however I have a much smaller front bar than you (oem 01) so I dont have as much force pulling that wheel up.
My rear shocks are similar but have less force at full stiff (I also run a softer spring back there). I have them backed off a bit in order to settle down my tail a little in transitions but at full stiff i also never had issues with bumps throwing me off (on my rears my low speed is similar to glagola's front shock, and my high speed is quite a bit less)
I also wonder if my valving is somehow set to account for what you mentioned earlier about at the beginning of the rebound stroke after a bump. But I dont see how that is possible.
My rear shocks are similar but have less force at full stiff (I also run a softer spring back there). I have them backed off a bit in order to settle down my tail a little in transitions but at full stiff i also never had issues with bumps throwing me off (on my rears my low speed is similar to glagola's front shock, and my high speed is quite a bit less)
I also wonder if my valving is somehow set to account for what you mentioned earlier about at the beginning of the rebound stroke after a bump. But I dont see how that is possible.
#34
Registered User
Originally Posted by nmrado,Mar 31 2010, 08:24 AM
Can someone add some of this info to the Auto-x FAQ and STR build thread? It would be nice if these plots remained easily accessible.
#36
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Another question for you all: (Perhaps worthy of a second thread) How do you feel about low/zero gas pressure shocks? In an autoX setting will the shocks cavitate? (make bubbles in the fluid) If this happens, does it create a lot of inconsistency in the shock performance?
The Grimes spec Yellow calls for zero gas pressure. Great for getting just a bit lower ride height, not good for cavitation. Thoughts/comments?
The Grimes spec Yellow calls for zero gas pressure. Great for getting just a bit lower ride height, not good for cavitation. Thoughts/comments?
#37
Former Moderator
Originally Posted by glagola1,Mar 31 2010, 07:31 AM
Macr88, does this clear up what you quoted me on?
I understand the outcome but I guess I never thought low speed would cause that.
#38
Former Moderator
Originally Posted by Forcednduckshn,Mar 31 2010, 11:25 AM
Another question for you all: (Perhaps worthy of a second thread) How do you feel about low/zero gas pressure shocks? In an autoX setting will the shocks cavitate? (make bubbles in the fluid) If this happens, does it create a lot of inconsistency in the shock performance?
The Grimes spec Yellow calls for zero gas pressure. Great for getting just a bit lower ride height, not good for cavitation. Thoughts/comments?
The Grimes spec Yellow calls for zero gas pressure. Great for getting just a bit lower ride height, not good for cavitation. Thoughts/comments?
#39
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by macr88,Mar 31 2010, 10:42 AM
I think someone posted DG's link and he goes over it here http://farnorthracing.com/autocross_secrets6.html
#40
Originally Posted by Forcednduckshn,Mar 31 2010, 01:49 PM
Yes I was about to post that link, that write up is what got me thinking. What I'm curious about is what people here have experienced with zero gas pressure shocks - specifically - is cavitation really a big deal in an autoX environment?
Remote reservoir shocks on the other hand - don't need gas pressure to get compression damping. The diameter of the hose orifice provides enough pressure to force the oil through the piston valves during the compression stroke. This is why you can run a really low gas pressure on a reservoir shock and get away with it (not that you would want to).
So on a twin tube shock - the amount of gas pressure increases the compression damping. On a reservoir shock - it doesn't. It can increase the stiction and nose angle (initial movement of the shock). It also preloads the spring. It can add spring rate - but not in the same way as a coil spring.
Marc - you'll change your mind once you drive a car with a lot of low speed compression. Its phenomenal feeling. I have the same rebound valving as Corey's car and I hate it. I can't use anything other than full soft - and I got the same story from Stimola about how I'll hate low speed compression and that his rebound valving is what EVERYONE who is anyone in SCCA is using. I had to fight like hell to get what I wanted in my shocks for the compression - I'm not going to give SRP any more of my money so I'm going to try revalving my Penske's on my own next offseason - I really would like to be able to use the knob on top of the shock. To be honest with you - with as crappy as the rebound valving is - I don't understand how they are even in business if they do this stuff on the road race cars. He even gave me the line "Rebound increases grip" - ha, my ass it does...