CAMBER SETTINGS FOR TRACK - more in front or rear
#1
CAMBER SETTINGS FOR TRACK - more in front or rear
like some input from you guys what is the personal preference?
assuming everything else is constant, to have half degree more in the front or rear?
i.e setup A, Front camber 3 degree, Rear 2.5 degree
Setup B, Front 2.5 degree, Rear 3 degree
Also, will running a staggered as opposed to a non staggered setup affects the choice?
opinions please!
assuming everything else is constant, to have half degree more in the front or rear?
i.e setup A, Front camber 3 degree, Rear 2.5 degree
Setup B, Front 2.5 degree, Rear 3 degree
Also, will running a staggered as opposed to a non staggered setup affects the choice?
opinions please!
#4
Former Moderator
You should do some testing with a pyrometer. If your driving style cannot utilize all the -camber you set, then you are just robbing yourself of contact patch.
But generally, go with more camber at the rear and less at the front in the s2k.
But generally, go with more camber at the rear and less at the front in the s2k.
#5
S2k setups are usually more rear camber, but in many cases that's due to more rear camber being available, and also to the early S2k's rear roll stiffness bias. RWD production cars almost always run more rear camber for a safer more understeering handling demeanor, but more front camber is the norm for decent power/weight rwd track cars.
What's best on your particular car depends on the overall setup. Personally, I'd go for more front camber (~3 front, ~2.5 rear) and stiffer front vs. rear roll stiffness to balance.
As for pyrometer testing, be aware that even temps across the tread is not necessarily the ideal. The stopwatch is the ultimate measure of what's really optimal. Faster setups will often run hotter temps at the inside of the tread. This is partially because at higher speed straightaways, you're heating the inside tread more than you'll heat the outside during cornering.
What's best on your particular car depends on the overall setup. Personally, I'd go for more front camber (~3 front, ~2.5 rear) and stiffer front vs. rear roll stiffness to balance.
As for pyrometer testing, be aware that even temps across the tread is not necessarily the ideal. The stopwatch is the ultimate measure of what's really optimal. Faster setups will often run hotter temps at the inside of the tread. This is partially because at higher speed straightaways, you're heating the inside tread more than you'll heat the outside during cornering.
#6
Miatas runs more front camber.
but I agree with zDan, need a pyrometer, every car is different, and driving style is different. ideally you want inside ~5F warmer than middle, which is ~5F warmer than outside.
power is a factor. less rear camber enable you to put more power down. less front camber allows better braking. so everything is a balance.
but I agree with zDan, need a pyrometer, every car is different, and driving style is different. ideally you want inside ~5F warmer than middle, which is ~5F warmer than outside.
power is a factor. less rear camber enable you to put more power down. less front camber allows better braking. so everything is a balance.
Trending Topics
#9
Originally Posted by s2kpearlwhite,Feb 15 2009, 07:55 AM
all things being constant, on a non staggered 255 setup AP2, will a bigger front camber than rear cause more oversteer?
#10
Originally Posted by s2kpearlwhite,Feb 15 2009, 07:55 AM
all things being constant, on a non staggered 255 setup AP2, will a bigger front camber than rear cause more oversteer?
Am I on the right track?