camber -3.0 with hoosiers...
#1
Thread Starter
camber -3.0 with hoosiers...
My tires wear evenly all the way across... all three sets of hoosiers that I have had still have lots of tread on them but they get heat cycled out.
I thought I would go with a more aggressive alignment (i am still new to this stuff so thanks for the help).
currently
Camber -2.6 front -2.5 Rear
Caster 5.6
Toe -.03in Front .12in rear
If I leave the rear alone basically and go with -3.0 camber in the front.... will that be a noticable difference? I ran the -2.6 all last year.
thanks
I thought I would go with a more aggressive alignment (i am still new to this stuff so thanks for the help).
currently
Camber -2.6 front -2.5 Rear
Caster 5.6
Toe -.03in Front .12in rear
If I leave the rear alone basically and go with -3.0 camber in the front.... will that be a noticable difference? I ran the -2.6 all last year.
thanks
#3
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by jerrypeterson,Apr 22 2005, 01:59 PM
So you have ideal tire wear and you want to increase camber?
make sense?
#4
Registered User
I get it.
(not trying to muddy the water but...)
However if tire wear isn't an issue, then you should consider testing for an optimum configuration on a per track basis. Willow Springs for example: all of the long high speed turns are right handers so it would be wise to optomize your setup for right hand turns.
For the same reason I would think it would be difficult to assess what increasing your front camber will do from behind our comfy computers.
(not trying to muddy the water but...)
However if tire wear isn't an issue, then you should consider testing for an optimum configuration on a per track basis. Willow Springs for example: all of the long high speed turns are right handers so it would be wise to optomize your setup for right hand turns.
For the same reason I would think it would be difficult to assess what increasing your front camber will do from behind our comfy computers.
#5
Thread Starter
i am just looking for a pretty aggressive all around alignment for lefts and rights and some normal straights.....the car is pretty decent at everything right now so I thought I would try to improve on it.....
i think Krazik says he is over -3.0 camber? I guess I could do a search....baaaaa
i think Krazik says he is over -3.0 camber? I guess I could do a search....baaaaa
#7
I changed my front camber only from -2.0 to -3.0, all else was left unchanged, and there was a significant difference in handling and tirewear. Now I have -3.0 all around and the car feels balanced and better than ever, with even tire wear inside and outside but the centers are less worn than usual (so I am throwing away a lot of center rubber). Whether it will work better for your car I think would depend a lot on the rest of your setup, including tire sizes and make, spring rates, aero etc.
Trending Topics
#8
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by rlaifatt,Apr 24 2005, 12:58 AM
I changed my front camber only from -2.0 to -3.0, all else was left unchanged, and there was a significant difference in handling and tirewear. Now I have -3.0 all around and the car feels balanced and better than ever, with even tire wear inside and outside but the centers are less worn than usual (so I am throwing away a lot of center rubber). Whether it will work better for your car I think would depend a lot on the rest of your setup, including tire sizes and make, spring rates, aero etc.
I only have crappy tein RA's and I don't know the spring rates.
#9
Registered User
Originally Posted by Scot,Apr 24 2005, 04:17 PM
thank you. I figure at the worst I will undo the alignment back to my current setting if I am slower or don't like the -3.0...
I only have crappy tein RA's and I don't know the spring rates.
I only have crappy tein RA's and I don't know the spring rates.
#10
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by jerrypeterson,Apr 25 2005, 01:41 PM
I believe the standard set of springs shipped with the Tein RA's were 10k rates all around. Please don't make mission critical decisions with that figure though.