S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

AST 4100 Dampers

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-28-2012, 09:32 AM
  #101  

 
ndogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

The Eibach stuff can be found here: http://eibach.com/eibach/img/ers-catalog-2004.pdf

Also, you are forgetting about the motion ratio (.67 rear I believe). So with 750lb corner weight, there would be ~1100lbs on the spring.
Old 11-28-2012, 09:50 AM
  #102  
Registered User

 
berny2435's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ndogg
The Eibach stuff can be found here: http://eibach.com/eibach/img/ers-catalog-2004.pdf

Also, you are forgetting about the motion ratio (.67 rear I believe). So with 750lb corner weight, there would be ~1100lbs on the spring.

Thats a better catalogue than the one I found on their main site. nice find. Saved for later use.

yeah, I botched that one up. At work, tried to make a post in between tasks. yeah, I run 650s rear and they compress around 1.4"
Old 11-29-2012, 09:54 AM
  #103  
JJ7

 
JJ7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 785
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ndogg
The Eibach stuff can be found here: http://eibach.com/eibach/img/ers-catalog-2004.pdf

Also, you are forgetting about the motion ratio (.67 rear I believe). So with 750lb corner weight, there would be ~1100lbs on the spring.
Assuming stock offsets right? Its even lower with lower offset wheels. My +38s are 1 full inch further out than my stock +63s. Maybe somebody better at math can tell me what my motion ratio is now. I know I run an aggressive offset but most people with suspension are running around 40-50 still.
Old 11-29-2012, 12:13 PM
  #104  

 
ndogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I shot an email to AST-USA and they recommended 6" springs for me with 550lb springs. They said the 5.5" was more for people running ~750lb rear springs.
Old 11-29-2012, 12:21 PM
  #105  

 
//steve\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 10,465
Likes: 0
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Are these new ones a full threaded body?

When I had my 4100s the threads didn't go all the way down the body and with 600lb rear springs and helpers even with the perch as low as it would go the rear was around 12.75-13" ride height. It could not go any lower. I think some of the hyperco real low stack height helpers would fix the problem but I'm just curious now.
Old 11-29-2012, 12:27 PM
  #106  
Former Sponsor
 
GT Motoring's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago Burbs
Posts: 16,133
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by //steve\\
Are these new ones a full threaded body?

When I had my 4100s the threads didn't go all the way down the body and with 600lb rear springs and helpers even with the perch as low as it would go the rear was around 12.75-13" ride height. It could not go any lower. I think some of the hyperco real low stack height helpers would fix the problem but I'm just curious now.
From the drawings Ive seen, they are not. I'll double check though.
Old 11-29-2012, 07:07 PM
  #107  
TWF

 
TWF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by macr88
So then unless you run 12.25-.5 then you'd probably have issues with 5.5" springs
That depends on springs used. Just because one spring is shorter than other does not mean you will run out of travel.
For example this two springs have same rate (450#) and same travel.

Old 11-29-2012, 07:30 PM
  #108  
Former Moderator

 
macr88's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Emmett
Posts: 14,849
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I'm referring to block height not useable height.
Old 11-29-2012, 07:50 PM
  #109  
TWF

 
TWF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What block height has to do with it if both give you same travel? If shock has more travel than spring either one will bottom with enough load.
Old 12-02-2012, 03:59 AM
  #110  
Registered User
 
cuonice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GT Motoring II
Originally Posted by ndogg' timestamp='1354069826' post='22175829
What spring lengths are going to ship with these?

I know you said 6" front and 5.5" rear at one point but that seems kinda short in the rear. Potentially run out of spring travel...
The recommendation if using spring tenders is 6in front and 5.5in rear. Without tenders, a 7in front and a 6.5in rear.
You'll want to mock a set of these up before packaging them with those spring lengths; if they are anything like the previous generation 4100/5100 you will be relegated to running a relatively short spring to obtain most users' desired ride height. In most rates used within the S2000 community, you probably won't go longer than a 6" spring all around. Really no good reason to either - I can't think of a user that needs the extra length so its just extra weight and less adjustability.

This all assumes they are similar in dimension to the previous 4100/5100.

On a semi-related note: The first set of 4100's sold stateside back in 2008 just won double National Championships with NASA in the Honda Challenge H1 and Time Trial B class. They are on 6"x700/5.5"x650 springs respectively with AST spherical top hats. Four seasons of HARD racing on those shocks and they are still turning record laps!

-Aaron


Quick Reply: AST 4100 Dampers



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:28 PM.