S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

Aerodynamic benefits of Mugen vs. OEM hardtop

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-26-2003, 06:57 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Asura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Anaheim, Orange County
Posts: 8,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Aerodynamic benefits of Mugen vs. OEM hardtop

It looks like I have no option but to remove my soft-top to accommodate the new rollbar. The question is Mugen or OEM hard-top. I know the Mugen has plexiglass and no defroster in comparison to the OEM glass rear window. I am also aware that Mugen is made of fiberglass while the OEM is made of metal.

Can anyone here comment on how each hard-top would work in conjunction with a functional rear spoiler?

Thanks.

Asura
Old 10-26-2003, 10:52 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
ultimate lurker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: You wish
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I had one of each in my garage recently. The Mugen has a better transition from the roof to the rear deck lid - IOW, the divergence angle is smaller. This will make for smoother flowing air at the rear and should result in reduced drag. It will also likely improve the effectiveness of your rear wing or spoiler (more clean air to the device).

Combined with the much lighter weight of the Mugen on what will be the highest located mass on the car, you can't go wrong if you can afford it.

UL
Old 10-27-2003, 02:18 AM
  #3  
Registered User

 
jguerdat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 3,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

And if you can REALLY afford it, Mugen has a CF one, too.

I have the OEM one...
Old 10-27-2003, 07:49 AM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Asura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Anaheim, Orange County
Posts: 8,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The price for a Mugen unpainted ($2700) is about the same for an OEM painted ($2600). CF is out of the budget. If I can't find a used OEM, I'll go with the Mugen.

I am also looking for the mounting brackets to the wing to be removable. I don't mind if the feet are permanantly attached to the the rear deck lid. I just don't need the extra attention on the street from the large wing that in hang over each side by ~1ft. Any ideas?
Old 10-27-2003, 09:08 AM
  #5  
Administrator


 
krazik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Santa Cruz, CA, US
Posts: 17,004
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

The mugen isn't much lighter.

The OEM top w/o the interior stuff & glass window weights 45lbs, the mugen CF top weighs 35lbs. I think the FRP is closer to 45.

So as far as weight is concerned they're all about equal.

Of course the mugen has lower drag as is pretty clear by its shape.

Ashish why can't you keep the rag top, there's should be no reason tony can't make you a bar that fits.
Old 10-27-2003, 09:50 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
mxt_77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wylie, TX
Posts: 8,482
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by krazik
The mugen isn't much lighter.
Old 10-27-2003, 10:39 AM
  #7  
Registered User

 
jguerdat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 3,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The OEM top is 44 lbs., including liner, glass window, etc.
Old 10-27-2003, 10:59 AM
  #8  
Administrator


 
krazik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Santa Cruz, CA, US
Posts: 17,004
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Per my longacre scales the top w/o liners and w/ glass rear window is 45lbs.

http://forums.s2ki.com/forums/showthread.p...threadid=153966
Old 10-27-2003, 11:26 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
mxt_77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wylie, TX
Posts: 8,482
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

OK... that makes more sense.

In that case... I may look into getting the OEM hardtop some day. I thought the weight would be much higher than the Mugen hardtops. I'm not sure I could see paying an extra $2500 for the CF just to save an additional 10 lbs. Although, I'd probably do it if I could afford it.
Old 10-27-2003, 11:42 AM
  #10  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Asura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Anaheim, Orange County
Posts: 8,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well I went to see Tony on Friday with Kster. His final verdict, after seeing my car with the top down was that the diagonal bars going back from the main hoop in the direction of the rear bumper (must be >30 degrees) don't have enough clearance with the soft top. And in his opinion, any bar that he would make to fit in the confined space would be a compromise on safety.

His advice to me was two-fold:

1) decide street car or race car
2) If race car, get a hard-top.
3) Then add bar/cage, seat and harness

This hobby is turning into a disease


Quick Reply: Aerodynamic benefits of Mugen vs. OEM hardtop



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:46 PM.