S2000 Naturally Aspirated Forum Discussions about N/A motor projects, builds and technology.

Possible to build for 10k reliably on f22c?

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-02-2013, 05:11 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
s2kreeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Possible to build for 10k reliably on f22c?

Hey, I've been kicking around the idea of what happens when the engine starts wearing out and I pull it for a build (won't be any time soon.. only 50k) and I was wondering if anyone had experience with a setup that reliably gets to 10k? I'd love to start getting a list for parts going.
Old 02-02-2013, 06:58 PM
  #2  

 
JUSTINTHECOASTIE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: St.Petersburg/Tampa, FL
Posts: 4,806
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

10k on an F20c stock can be done. 10k out of a F22c wouldn't make it due to height of shortblock and then of stroke, piston speeds, piston side load at that rpm....tons of other variables I'm too tipsy to ramble on about
Old 02-03-2013, 06:27 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
s2kreeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So you can't even get it with proper retainers, valve springs, and a lighter piston/rod combo? Darn
Old 02-03-2013, 06:36 PM
  #4  

 
JUSTINTHECOASTIE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: St.Petersburg/Tampa, FL
Posts: 4,806
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

In an F22c I forget what rpm you get piston valve contact but i know contact is before 10k. The issue is bigger than lighter rod and upgraded valve train
Old 02-04-2013, 11:17 AM
  #5  
Community Organizer
Community Organizer
 
s2000Junky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,059
Received 554 Likes on 506 Posts
Default

If you have a heavy enough valve spring to keep the valves from floating, there wont be any valve to piston contact. If the F20 can do it so can the F22. Revisions for good connecting rods will be more crucial in the f22 due to the higher crank stroke and shorter rod length = more rod angle= more rod stresses. The head is the easy part. Personally if I wanted to make a high rpm screamer and have it last a little longer, id go with an f20 build. One thing to consider, for upping the displacement without jeopardizing rpm limitations, is run a bigger piston, going over square. Keep the crank stroke short.
Old 02-05-2013, 05:01 AM
  #6  

 
JUSTINTHECOASTIE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: St.Petersburg/Tampa, FL
Posts: 4,806
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by s2000Junky
If you have a heavy enough valve spring to keep the valves from floating, there wont be any valve to piston contact. If the F20 can do it so can the F22. Revisions for good connecting rods will be more crucial in the f22 due to the higher crank stroke and shorter rod length = more rod angle= more rod stresses. The head is the easy part. Personally if I wanted to make a high rpm screamer and have it last a little longer, id go with an f20 build. One thing to consider, for upping the displacement without jeopardizing rpm limitations, is run a bigger piston, going over square. Keep the crank stroke short.
I agree. Much easier to do with a F20c. Op maybe you could be the first to build a F18c revving to 14k LOL
Old 02-05-2013, 07:43 AM
  #7  

 
Kermdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Harvest, AL
Posts: 4,643
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The issue is not if you can do it, but the cams won't make power that high. You would have to have a custom set of cams to take advantage. I personally can't justify the cost, but can see the value if you do it right.
Old 02-15-2013, 04:58 PM
  #8  

 
liquid_helix136's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,289
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

My ap1 has a flat torque curve from 7k all the way to redline (set at 9300) I upped it from 9k because I noticed torque wasn't dropping off for whatever reason. It slightly begins to fall off at about 9200, but I bet if I had the means, it would be worth while to take it to 10k. I know this definitely isn't the case for a lot of engines, especially F22s, as torque tends to start dropping off around 7k on those motors. But I've seen plenty f20 dynos that are still going strong at 9k.

If you did run into the problem of torque dropping off up top, it seems the BC stage2 cams help up top a good bit, so that may be enough to keep torque up at high rpms
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alanpikku
S2000 Forced Induction
48
09-07-2022 06:45 AM
912S2k
S2000 Under The Hood
33
01-02-2018 03:12 AM
SpitfireS
S2000 Under The Hood
97
02-01-2013 02:34 PM
Carbon Blue
S2000 Under The Hood
0
01-21-2012 02:15 PM
WalkingDrunken
S2000 Under The Hood
16
03-07-2006 05:46 PM



Quick Reply: Possible to build for 10k reliably on f22c?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:33 AM.