S2000 Naturally Aspirated Forum Discussions about N/A motor projects, builds and technology.

FIPK w/ AUT Plate vs Stock Set-up with K&N filter

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-01-2010, 04:37 PM
  #31  
Registered User
 
TruBluS2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Behind Enemy Lines
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the faster you are moving the more air that is going to be forced in sounds like a great idea to me
Old 11-02-2010, 06:35 AM
  #32  
Former Sponsor
 
Gernby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I don't doubt that the aut cooling plate may increase the amount of cool air to the filter. What I dispute is the term "forced". If you calculate the volume of air being sucked into the intake, and calculate the velocity of air that would have to be flowing through the auto cooling plate to "force" the air, you would realize that it's just not happening.
Old 11-02-2010, 10:22 AM
  #33  
Registered User
 
TruBluS2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Behind Enemy Lines
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well the air is going to be forced into the front of the car depending on the speed of the car. This is not going to creat a real "ram air" effect as a closed box and snorkle might but there will be more "cooler" air for the intake to suck up. So im sure it helps out
Old 11-03-2010, 08:54 PM
  #34  
Registered User

 
Silverstone2k4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Hazlet, New Jersey
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by H22toF20,Oct 31 2010, 05:26 AM
If you believe the manufacturer, then you are an idiot. 99% of the time they post a result from a "once in a life time" condition, to get a big performance increase; or they lie through their teeth altogether.
That may be true in some cases, but who is better qualified to provide performance data (albeit biased) then the company that engineered a part in the first place. After all, they possess equipment needed to measure before and after air flow / pressures / temperatures that the average consumer will not have. If anything, publishing better performance data will increase sales of a part. I'm always more interested in upgrades that have extensive documentation such as dyno graphs. I realize a dyno graph may not apply in the case of the AUT plate, but some sort of chart would be appreciated.
Old 11-04-2010, 12:20 AM
  #35  
Registered User

 
H22toF20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Clatskanie, OR
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Silverstone2k4,Nov 3 2010, 08:54 PM
That may be true in some cases, but who is better qualified to provide performance data (albeit biased) then the company that engineered a part in the first place. After all, they possess equipment needed to measure before and after air flow / pressures / temperatures that the average consumer will not have. If anything, publishing better performance data will increase sales of a part. I'm always more interested in upgrades that have extensive documentation such as dyno graphs. I realize a dyno graph may not apply in the case of the AUT plate, but some sort of chart would be appreciated.
They're probably more qualified(depending on the company) but they won't do it just to hide their secrets. This leaves the consumer or shop to do the testing for the community to see what power is made and where, how much lower the IAT is at a given speed ect.

Seriously though, I've owned a Honda long enough to never believe their quoted HP/torque increase. 25hp from an intake another 25hp for a header, this is pure BS.,
Old 11-05-2010, 05:07 PM
  #36  
Registered User

 
defcon83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

this was a good post keep it coming.... Would you say it is better just to have a K&N fipk and leave the stock radiator shroud???
Old 11-05-2010, 09:02 PM
  #37  
Registered User

 
H22toF20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Clatskanie, OR
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by defcon83,Nov 5 2010, 05:07 PM
this was a good post keep it coming.... Would you say it is better just to have a K&N fipk and leave the stock radiator shroud???
I felt a difference with the AUT over the factory, so no. If you run with out the OEM and AUT plate, most of the air will bypass the radiator altogether; not good.
Old 11-06-2010, 12:08 AM
  #38  
Community Organizer

Thread Starter
 
alSpeed2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The 604
Posts: 10,590
Received 77 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

^hopefully I can get around to looking at the other data this weekend and then we can see the different temps w/ & w/o the stock radiator shroud.
Old 11-06-2010, 05:40 AM
  #39  
Registered User

 
defcon83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yea i had a aem v2 and w.e. difference it made from the k&n fipk that i have now good or bad it was not worth have the aem v2 due to where i live there is bad weather at times.
Old 11-11-2010, 01:58 PM
  #40  
Community Organizer

Thread Starter
 
alSpeed2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The 604
Posts: 10,590
Received 77 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Raw data updated on post 2.


Quick Reply: FIPK w/ AUT Plate vs Stock Set-up with K&N filter



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:39 AM.