S2000 Naturally Aspirated Forum Discussions about N/A motor projects, builds and technology.

2.4L S2000 build

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-16-2009 | 05:08 PM
  #1  
EvasiveMotorsports's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,605
Likes: 35
From: Los Angeles
Default 2.4L S2000 build

Hey guys just got back from the dyno and wanted to share the results with you guys.

this is a customer's 04 ap2 that we put together using the following parts

2.4L BC stroker kit 11.4:1 compressoin
darton sleeves
BC stage 2 Camshaft
upgraded valvetrain, stock head.
AEM EMS
440cc injectors
j's intake
j's header, j's titanium 70mm header back exhaust
91 Pump

we were pretty surprised at how much torque the car made over stock, the graph is a comparison to stock ap1.


Old 09-16-2009 | 06:00 PM
  #2  
Randizzle88's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,997
Likes: 0
From: COMPTON
Default

Wow 255 on bisi dyno is alot. For some reason his reads really low for a dyna pack. Nice numbers
Old 09-16-2009 | 06:15 PM
  #3  
chris_barry's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,938
Likes: 4
From: Sydney
Default

Very cool, thanks for sharing the results.

Gives me some additional incentives to put the spec C's cams and itb's on my otherwise stock F24C.

Chris.
Old 09-16-2009 | 06:29 PM
  #4  
GyozA's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 2
Default

Woah that's awesome. Nice #'s. I was thinking about getting that kit rather than a new bottom end. How reliable do you think that kit would be with proper tuning?
Old 09-16-2009 | 09:55 PM
  #5  
EvasiveMotorsports's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,605
Likes: 35
From: Los Angeles
Default

04 and on model dynopacks are calibrated to read closer to dyno jet. #'s aren't inflated like older models.

Old 09-16-2009 | 10:17 PM
  #6  
S2Kage's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,939
Likes: 1
From: Philadelphia, PA
Default

Thats cool, you guys should put stock cams in it then redyno and let us know if the BC ones worked or not
Old 09-16-2009 | 10:38 PM
  #7  
Randizzle88's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,997
Likes: 0
From: COMPTON
Default

Originally Posted by EvasiveMotorsports,Sep 16 2009, 09:55 PM
04 and on model dynopacks are calibrated to read closer to dyno jet. #'s aren't inflated like older models.
What EMS? and Intake
Old 09-16-2009 | 10:43 PM
  #8  
EvasiveMotorsports's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,605
Likes: 35
From: Los Angeles
Default

updated
Old 09-16-2009 | 11:36 PM
  #9  
DeadZero's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,896
Likes: 0
Default

great numbers, but i have one question.... whats up with the torque? you make about 175lbs to about 155lbs then back up? then you peak torque around 6500rpms then lose it?? maybe its those cams? idk but the torque is like a wave lol.

But regardless of torque the hp numbers look great!!
Old 09-17-2009 | 12:02 AM
  #10  
EvasiveMotorsports's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,605
Likes: 35
From: Los Angeles
Default

Originally Posted by DeadZero,Sep 17 2009, 12:36 AM
great numbers, but i have one question.... whats up with the torque? you make about 175lbs to about 155lbs then back up? then you peak torque around 6500rpms then lose it?? maybe its those cams? idk but the torque is like a wave lol.

But regardless of torque the hp numbers look great!!
the dip in the torque can be fixed if we had adjustable cam sprockets.


Quick Reply: 2.4L S2000 build



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:24 AM.