It looks fast too!
#81
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
#82
No question about it. I personally wouldn't even think of using a TP. It's not like they do a visual check under your car if there's no reason for it. If they smell it I'm sure they'd question it and also want to look under your hood for starters.
#85
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
My mid-pipe would work great with a 3" single. I actually designed my whole system as a 3" exhaust, and tested ~8 different 3" mufflers in various configurations. It wasn't until late last year that I decided to test a smaller diameter pipe from the header to the expansion chamber, which is when I discovered even better midrange. The process to install a 60mm, 63mm, or 76mm muffler secton to the back of the mid-pipe would be the same.
#86
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
I did get the Q300 installed with my mid-pipe, and the results were as expected. I'll post the plots of the results soon. Unfortunately, the Q300 is still way too raspy. I will have to put sound deadening material inside the expansion chamber later this week, and see if that reduces the rasp enough.
#87
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
After doing all my data collecting with the Q300 and test pipe and also with my mid-pipe, I decided to mount up a conventional HFC (Berk style) with the Q300 to see how it did. I liked the tone of the Q300 better with the HFC, but damn does that thing drone!! At light throttle, the drone is really bad.
In order to test the drone, I use a 4 channel surround sound digital recorder, as shown below. Then I use custom software to isolate the component of the recording that is generated by the exhaust. I do several of the rtecordings at full throttle (WOT) and also at a "cruising throttle". To get a repeatable cruising throttle, I use a special FlashPro map with a target throttle plate that is restricted to maintain a nearly perfect 500 mBar. At that load level, I can accellerate very slowly in lower gears, but it will just barely maintain a speed in 6th gear.
Below are graphs showing the output from the standard Q300 with a test pipe, standard Q300 with an HFC, and the Q300 with my mid-pipe (integrated HFC). The Y axis is linear sound level, but is not any particular unit (not dBA). A higher number indicates more noise...
Full throttle
Cruise Throttle
In order to test the drone, I use a 4 channel surround sound digital recorder, as shown below. Then I use custom software to isolate the component of the recording that is generated by the exhaust. I do several of the rtecordings at full throttle (WOT) and also at a "cruising throttle". To get a repeatable cruising throttle, I use a special FlashPro map with a target throttle plate that is restricted to maintain a nearly perfect 500 mBar. At that load level, I can accellerate very slowly in lower gears, but it will just barely maintain a speed in 6th gear.
Below are graphs showing the output from the standard Q300 with a test pipe, standard Q300 with an HFC, and the Q300 with my mid-pipe (integrated HFC). The Y axis is linear sound level, but is not any particular unit (not dBA). A higher number indicates more noise...
Full throttle
Cruise Throttle