K&N FIPK vs CT Icebox?
#11
Originally Posted by JDMpearlwhyteZ' timestamp='1378683595' post='22767734
It doesn't really matter both are under the hood and will still get hot air from under the hood.. The difference between those two intakes is minimal.. So get which ever you think looks or sounds better..
I had a fipk and the heat bog killed it for me..
I had a fipk and the heat bog killed it for me..
did you notice a significant increase in heat bog with the fipk over the stock intake? even at stock, I can feel the engine shuddering on a hot day with A/C. i'm starting to realize that this might be an issue with having a 4 cylinder engine in general.
But what I can tell you is that when I had my fipk with or without the ac on I could feel it if I was in traffic or at a red light long enough. And with my aem v2 I only get the bog like sensation with the ac on if im sitting in ine spot long enough. Ac off there is no bog, so its probably just the lack of torque from the engine combined with the ac pulling what it needs.
#14
Personally, I had the CT engineering intake on my last S due to it's box/lid and thought it looked better, but performance-wise, they shouldn't be far off.
#15
Originally Posted by spaceman_spiff' timestamp='1378675028' post='22767574
I realize one is a short ram and one is a CAI, so there's also an issue of hydrolocking.
Personally, I had the CT engineering intake on my last S due to it's box/lid and thought it looked better, but performance-wise, they shouldn't be far off.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post