S2000 Modifications and Parts Discussions about aftermarket products and parts including reviews, information and opinion.

Help With Alignment Specs

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-13-2009, 11:56 AM
  #1  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
integlspwr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 2,064
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Thumbs up Help With Alignment Specs

I am currently running Tein RS max lowered all the way around and needed some help with my alignment specs.

My currently setup is.

10k/10k front and rear springs
17x9 +38 Rims
255.40.17

Currently i like my car to be setup for oversteer but don't know what alignment setup everyone is running in addition to the non-staggered / oversteer setup.

Post them up!

Thanks!
Old 07-13-2009, 02:23 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
viper_driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North Las Vegas
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

When I went from USA to UK alignment specs it added a lot more oversteer...and a lot more rear tire life.

I still have staggered setup though, sorry. This probably doesn't help, but here's my specs:

front:
caster: 6 deg 45"
camber: -1 deg
toe: 0

rear:
camber: -2 deg
toe per side: 0.2 deg
total toe: 0.4 deg

Jason
Old 07-13-2009, 02:36 PM
  #3  
Registered User

 
ahrmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Viper, are you serious? You sure you dont mean the other way?
The UK spec is VERY aggressive - it wore out my rear tires in <6K miles... it also made the car much less twitchy and over-steer happy.

When I actually talked to the alignment guy and gave him the UK spec, he was like 'are you sure you want this much rear toe?' 'the tire will wear out like crazy..' and it did.

I went to a custom-ish alignment spec this time: UK spec everything, but much less toe.
Old 07-13-2009, 02:36 PM
  #4  
Registered User

 
AlexS2200's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 13851 A Better Way #11D, Garden Grove, CA 92843
Posts: 5,486
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

front:
caster: 6.0 deg
camber: -2.5 to -3 deg
toe: 0

rear:
camber: -3 to -4 deg
toe: 3/16 in Toe in Total
Old 07-13-2009, 02:38 PM
  #5  
Registered User

 
ahrmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

integ, im not familiar with nonstag setup eithier, but Im sure by doing that you already have increased oversteer in your car. If you want more, you should get the toe in near zero? I gotta say tho, with more rear toe in, its easier to get the car back in control after you get it sideways.
Old 07-13-2009, 02:45 PM
  #6  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
integlspwr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 2,064
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AlexS2200,Jul 13 2009, 12:36 PM
front:
caster: 6.0 deg
camber: -2.5 to -3 deg
toe: 0

rear:
camber: -3 to -4 deg
toe: 3/16 in Toe in Total
Those alignment specs look good soo far.. I remember reid was saying 0 toe in the front all ways.

[QUOTE=ikeyballz,Jul 13 2009, 12:38 PM]integ, im not familiar with nonstag setup eithier, but Im sure by doing that you already have increased oversteer in your car.
Old 07-13-2009, 02:50 PM
  #7  
Registered User

 
AlexS2200's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 13851 A Better Way #11D, Garden Grove, CA 92843
Posts: 5,486
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by integlspwr,Jul 13 2009, 02:45 PM
Those alignment specs look good soo far.. I remember reid was saying 0 toe in the front all ways.
Not always 0 toe in front. Majority It depends on how your car is behaving. There has been some occasions people have toe out the front a little. It all depends on what track, what street, what turn etc. In the end its all a science w/ theory only to back it.
Old 07-14-2009, 03:28 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
viper_driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North Las Vegas
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

UK spec has LESS rear toe in than us. Something about US not being able to handle the oversteer nature of the UK spec. We tend to sue too much over everything....actually I buy that explanation.

Anyway, I was getting <10K from my rear tires with US spec over 3 tire changes. Swapped to UK spec and my rears have over 20K now and still look good. Same exact tires and no other changes but the alignment. Tires are Falken Azenis ST115s.

In my 'own car tested' opinion, UK spec is more oversteer happy, and wears tires less. In the words of a smarter man than I, "camber doesn't wear tires, toe does."

I LOVE the UK spec. I wouldn't go back for anything.

Ballz, I think you do want a little rear toe in. I wouldn't go to zero, but I'm not a professional either. In my case, it's a little bit of a toss up over camber and toe. My car is lowered so I don't have all the adjustment both directions....I'm sure everyone else lowered has the same issues.

Jason
Old 07-17-2009, 12:53 PM
  #9  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
integlspwr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 2,064
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

any more suggestions.
Old 07-17-2009, 12:57 PM
  #10  
Registered User

 
AlexS2200's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 13851 A Better Way #11D, Garden Grove, CA 92843
Posts: 5,486
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by integlspwr,Jul 17 2009, 12:53 PM
any more suggestions.
I suggest you go out and get an alignment and test multiple specs. There is no universal spec for running non-staggered. Driver preference and driving style have a lot to do with how a car is setup to drive. Some like more camber, some like less and so on and so forth. I think you should hop in the car and find out what works for you.


Quick Reply: Help With Alignment Specs



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:13 AM.