S2000 Modifications and Parts Discussions about aftermarket products and parts including reviews, information and opinion.

Engaging VTEC Earlier

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-10-2009, 08:22 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
s2kmiami69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Miami
Posts: 8,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i must be getting old, but i feel like if it isnt broke dont fix it
Old 03-10-2009, 09:29 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Nine1Sickness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=LostMotion,Mar 10 2009, 07:56 PM] There's no question that even on a dead stock car the VTEC can be lowered about 500 RPMs with very favorable results.
Old 03-11-2009, 04:20 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
24s2k7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Nine1Sickness,Mar 11 2009, 12:29 AM] I am not giving engineers too much credit; they are forced to comply with emission standards too. A very good example is the new US model
Old 03-11-2009, 04:26 AM
  #14  
Registered User

 
iDomN8U's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ontario
Posts: 7,430
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LostMotion,Mar 10 2009, 11:56 PM
There's no question that even on a dead stock car the VTEC can be lowered about 500 RPMs with very favorable results. I have no idea why Honda put it where they did, but that's the reality of the situation. I think sometimes people give "Honda Engineers" a little too much credit. Sometimes things are done as a business decision and sometimes things are just skipped over for expediency. For example the TSX cam profiles (not the cams themselves just the lobe profiles) were directly copied from the AP1. There's no way you can tell me that they just happened to have the exact same profile to optimize performance and MPG for two motors that are quite a bit different. It was expediency. I'm sure they put thought into where VTEC was set, but it may not have been 100% about peak performance.
Honda Engineers have to take into consideration several factors.

Not all gas is the same across the world
Decent MPG
Altitude
Climate
Pollution Control
Noise Control


I want you to build a car that will satisfy all conditions for everyone across the world... It's not easy so they build in "safety zones"

I've read about one car suffereing majorly from a vtec reduction while another was able to do it 300-400 rpms lower.

There are ALOT of variables, but if you want to zone in on your car, location, conditions you can optimize YOUR car and maximize HP.
Old 03-11-2009, 05:16 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
w00t692's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i sure do know with bolt-ons the civic si's gain a TON of midrange power with vtec engagement at 4500 instead of 5800. (note: Hondata reflash also advances cam angles before and during vtec to gain this midrange)

The same can be said of the s2000, (look at hondata reflash dyno curves) to see. There are lots of factors why they pick the stock vtec engagement. Almost none of them are from a performance standpoint.

The guy above me pegged some of the reasons.

But another is fun factor. It feels fun to have a violent engagement like the stock setup is (you can REALLY feel it). If you tune to have it engage lower, you will be faster, but you won't feel it. Just a smooth pull to redline.

People say this of the si reflash. It's DEFINITELY faster, but it doesn't feel as fun hehe. I will say i'm looking forward to getting my reflash on my si, but i love driving my girlfriend's s2000.
Old 03-11-2009, 07:20 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
Tjs S2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cincinnati, Oh
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ChefJ,Mar 10 2009, 11:01 PM
rpm isn't the only factor. you can drive at 6500 rpms and not be in vtec. There are load parameters that need to be met aswell, and throttle position requirements.
Didnt know that, Thanks
Old 03-11-2009, 07:49 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
INTJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Folks did a great job on this. My guess is that valve overlap at that RPM 4500 pushes the hydrocarbons too high and it can't meet ULEV.

What is the header used in that graph?
Old 03-11-2009, 08:25 AM
  #18  
Registered User
 
24s2k7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

toda. But other dynos have been done without the header with basically the same results. Showing there are great gains with a lower VTEC if done right. Ie. Hondata reflash
Old 03-11-2009, 09:47 AM
  #19  
Former Sponsor

 
Moddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 28,698
Received 38 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Sweet gains there witht he Hondata. I have mine set at 5500 and with the 4.77 gears make a nice combo. Doesn't feel like it pulls as hard in vtec since you don't feel it kick in but definitely made more power than when set at 6k.
Old 03-11-2009, 05:23 PM
  #20  
Registered User

 
bigmacnfries's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i've set my vtec so low that i'm in vtec at idle.


Quick Reply: Engaging VTEC Earlier



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:19 AM.