AP2 increase redline!...need help!
#31
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dry Branch
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by s2khondas,Dec 7 2007, 08:44 AM
so all the guys that have ap2's that run the ap1 ecu to take there motors to 9k is a bad idea? this is what im planning to do with the ap2motor i am swapping into my car, AP2 with AP1 ECU
Given what I have seen up to this point I have to see reving the F22C to 9k as a risk, not because it *will* cause the engine to fail, but because it *might* cause the engine to fail. I'm perfectly content to let others take the risks, because I'd rather learn from their mistakes than from my own.
If you are a risk taker, go for it, and keep us posted.
#32
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Santa Ana, Ca in the OC
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if you increase the redline... how do you know when you hit it? or cluster stops at 8k
and if u get an ap1 cluster. its sucks cause you cant even hit "redline"
autometer 10k gauge. out of the question. haha
and if u get an ap1 cluster. its sucks cause you cant even hit "redline"
autometer 10k gauge. out of the question. haha
#34
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dry Branch
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think there may be some issues in using the AP2/F22C cluster with the an F20C ECU, because all the guages in the cluster are different. As an alternate, you could probably use a later model EUDM cluster (newer gauge layout but 9k redline).
LOL, but I'd be more concerned about engine life at 9k than about the instrument cluster.
LOL, but I'd be more concerned about engine life at 9k than about the instrument cluster.
#35
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Many AP2 owners that have run/are running an AP1 ecu explain that they experience lower mid-range torque/power (thanks to the tune on the AP1 ecu, thus the need for a tune).
The AP2 head is more capable of 9k rpm compared to the AP1 head, also the AP2 cams weren't designed to make much power past 8k and the piston speed will surpass that of the AP1.
The only real danger is piston speed but a bad tune/no tune will also pose a problem.
The AP2 head is more capable of 9k rpm compared to the AP1 head, also the AP2 cams weren't designed to make much power past 8k and the piston speed will surpass that of the AP1.
The only real danger is piston speed but a bad tune/no tune will also pose a problem.
#37
The problem is dramatically increased sleeve wear above 8500 RPMs.
And when I use the word dramatic, I mean within a couple thousand track miles if you are in the 8400+ RPM range for long periods of time such as staying at 8600 RPMs around a long turn, for instance (as opposed to only on your way to the next gear). It's the increased side forces which are at work.
You're not going to send a piston through your hood or anything.
And when I use the word dramatic, I mean within a couple thousand track miles if you are in the 8400+ RPM range for long periods of time such as staying at 8600 RPMs around a long turn, for instance (as opposed to only on your way to the next gear). It's the increased side forces which are at work.
You're not going to send a piston through your hood or anything.
#39
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dry Branch
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^^ And our blocks are not sleeved, so the wear goes directly to the block (cylinder walls) and piston rings. The cylinder wall damage in the failures we've seen is downright nasty.
The open deck on Honda engines is also probably a factor as side loads increase.
The open deck on Honda engines is also probably a factor as side loads increase.
#40
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dry Branch
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dark,Dec 10 2007, 07:52 PM
I'd imagine someone could use an AFC/Emanage/etc.
If I gotta tune, I'd really rather go with a standalong EMS than piggyback an older ECU.